View Single Post
Old 10-27-2017, 08:51 AM   #1
cpylant
Junior Member
 
Location: Gainesville

Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 2
Unhappy Bioanalyzer/TapeStation fragment sizes larger than agarose gel

I am preparing libraries for GBS, and although the agarose gel image is as expected (i.e. the bulk of fragments between 200 and 400bp), TapeStation result show the fragment distribution shifted 300-400bp larger. This is a 1% gel stained with EtBr (in gel, not post-stained) 100V for 35 mins (distance between electrodes = 16cm). The TapeStation results are consistently larger, and the service lab is unable to provide any explanation for the discrepancy. The core lab told us to use the TapeStation after BioAnalyzer runs showed peaks that were not present in the agarose gel (our expected fragment sizes were correct, but a second more concentrated grouping at 600-2kb was also present which left the core at a loss for explanation).

I am wondering if I should trust the gel image over the TapeStation results. Can anyone suggest why TapeStation sizes would differ so much compared to the gel image? I appreciate your time and thank you in advance.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 10.17.2017_libraries_labeled.jpg (50.0 KB, 35 views)
Attached Files
File Type: pdf TapeStationTest Results.pdf (983.3 KB, 36 views)

Last edited by cpylant; 10-27-2017 at 08:56 AM.
cpylant is offline   Reply With Quote