Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • troubles with Radseq library preparation

    Hello all,

    I am preparing a library of a selected number of specimens (20 ind) following the ddRad seq protocol (Peterson et al. 2013). I am having difficulties because I start with 500ng of Dna but I loose so much DNA that I end to get very low concentration before the final PCR.
    In particular I loose more than 50% of DNA every beads wash or pooling. I using a concentration of 3X beads. Do you know if I am supposed to loose so much?
    How many max PCR cycles may I run whitout increasing the PCR errors?

    thank you

  • #2
    50% loss is too much; an acceptable loss is 10-15% and 3x bead is also excessive. You are using too much DNA to start with so if you go to PCR (multiple 20 ul reactions) with 2 ng of adapted size selected tags and 5% is amplifiable then up to 12 cycle should produce more than enough library for QC and sequencing.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by nucacidhunter View Post
      50% loss is too much; an acceptable loss is 10-15% and 3x bead is also excessive. You are using too much DNA to start with so if you go to PCR (multiple 20 ul reactions) with 2 ng of adapted size selected tags and 5% is amplifiable then up to 12 cycle should produce more than enough library for QC and sequencing.
      thank you for answering, I supposed that it was too much loss, but I do not know how to reduce it. Actually I am using more beads (3X) to reduce the loss but it is not working. I beleive it is related to the nature of digested samples because with other type of samples and the same beads I do not get so much loss. Any suggestions? otherwise 12 cycles will be not enough for my samples

      Comment


      • #4
        If digestable DNA fragments mostly are over 2kb, with standard clean up protocol loss might be higher. The quantity of Pippin size selected DNA is more important than loss and 10-20 ng recovery at the end should be enough. I normally do 12 cycles of PCR but I do not think that 13 cycle would cause any bias.

        Comment


        • #5
          After the Pippin site selection I have a concentration of 1.4 ng/ul, do you think I can do two runs of PCR (each of 20 ul and with 13 cycles) and than pool the PCR products 20+20ul?

          Comment


          • #6
            I Wonder how many ul of 1.4 you have and what was the total quantity of input DNA.

            Comment


            • #7
              At the end after Pippin (before PCR) I have 30ul of 1.4 ul solution (for a total 42ng) that is a pool of 4 samples, originally I started with a total of 2300 ng...as you can see I loose so much DNA along the way, is it normal?

              Comment


              • #8
                It seems OK. Final DNA recovery from Pippin depends on the quantity of fragments in the selected size range which will vary based on input, genome composition and restriction enzymes used among other factors.

                I think you can safely set up four 20 ul reactions using 5 ul of size selected tags per reaction and do 12 cycles. After 12 cycle you can check the PCR yield and size by TapeStation if it is available or at least check concentration with Qubit or PicoGreen. If PCR yield is around 1 ug/ul then no extra cycles would be needed. If it is lower then do 1 or 2 more cycles considering that each cycle yield will double.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Thank you very much nucacidhunter!
                  just to be clear: do you mean I can do different reactions and than pool the yields?

                  If the quantity is not enough may I use the PCR product (add again polymerase, NTP and so on) and re-run the PCR for extra run?

                  thanks again

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    PCR yield should be enough but it would depend on the amplifiable portion of size selected tags. It is better to do more cycles than re-amplifying PCR product because standard ddRAD does not include UMIs for identifying PCR duplicates and also it will affect allele frequency. 50 ng final library should be enough for QC and sequencing.

                    Edit: For extra 1-2 cycles there is no need for reagent addition. Just keep the reaction at 4 C while quantifying yield.
                    Last edited by nucacidhunter; 08-18-2017, 10:41 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      some suggestions:

                      Minimize tube transfers

                      Use the with bead method to reuse beads https://genomebiology.biomedcentral....b-2011-12-1-r1

                      don't throw out supernatant, then you can see if that's where your DNA is going by running it on a gel or fragment analyzer

                      if you have to do a transfer, elute the DNA from beads twice with smaller volume rather than once with larger volume

                      good luck

                      Comment

                      Latest Articles

                      Collapse

                      • seqadmin
                        Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
                        by seqadmin


                        Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
                        03-22-2024, 06:39 AM
                      • seqadmin
                        Techniques and Challenges in Conservation Genomics
                        by seqadmin



                        The field of conservation genomics centers on applying genomics technologies in support of conservation efforts and the preservation of biodiversity. This article features interviews with two researchers who showcase their innovative work and highlight the current state and future of conservation genomics.

                        Avian Conservation
                        Matthew DeSaix, a recent doctoral graduate from Kristen Ruegg’s lab at The University of Colorado, shared that most of his research...
                        03-08-2024, 10:41 AM

                      ad_right_rmr

                      Collapse

                      News

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:37 PM
                      0 responses
                      11 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post seqadmin  
                      Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:07 PM
                      0 responses
                      10 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post seqadmin  
                      Started by seqadmin, 03-22-2024, 10:03 AM
                      0 responses
                      51 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post seqadmin  
                      Started by seqadmin, 03-21-2024, 07:32 AM
                      0 responses
                      67 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post seqadmin  
                      Working...
                      X