Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DESeq without biological replicates (dataset: Marioni et al.)

    Hello,
    I'm trying to use DESeq (version 1.6.1) for differential analysis of the dataset of Marioni et al.
    This dataset contains the counts of 32000 genes sequenced from liver and kidney cells of only one patient. For each condition (liver and kidney), the authors sequenced the samples on different lanes of the machine. This results in replication techniques, but not biological replicates.

    Following the directions of the vignette, I summed the counts of technical replicates of liver and kidney. So, now I have a sample for kidney and a sample for liver, for each gene.

    I'm trying to use the estimateDispersions function with the parameters method="blind" and sharingMode="fit-only".
    By doing so I get a warning: "In parametricDispersionFit(means, disps) : Dispersion fit did not converge."
    If I try to use the estimateDispersions function with the parameters method="blind", sharingMode="fit-only" and also fitType="local", the warning disappears.

    Is this a correct choice of parameters, with this dataset?

    Thanks

  • #2
    Yes, even though the results will still not be very meaningful.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks for the clarification, Simon.

      So fitType="local" may be safely used when fitType="parametric" does not fails?

      My doubt is because in the vignette (chapter "Working without Any replicates") you don't sum the counts of the pasilla dataset, but you arbitrarily choose to use only two samples (one per condition).
      You make this choice to "simulate" a dataset in which there isn't any kind of replicates?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Andrea Apolloni View Post
        So fitType="local" may be safely used when fitType="parametric" does not fails?
        Yes. This is what the warning recommends, and, actually, I am not even sure yet which fit type I'd prefer.

        My doubt is because in the vignette (chapter "Working without Any replicates") you don't sum the counts of the pasilla dataset, but you arbitrarily choose to use only two samples (one per condition).
        You make this choice to "simulate" a dataset in which there isn't any kind of replicates?
        Exactly.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • seqadmin
          Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
          by seqadmin


          The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
          Yesterday, 07:01 AM
        • seqadmin
          Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
          by seqadmin


          Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
          04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
        0 responses
        55 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
        0 responses
        51 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
        0 responses
        45 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
        0 responses
        55 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Working...
        X