Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DESeq without biological replicates (dataset: Marioni et al.)

    Hello,
    I'm trying to use DESeq (version 1.6.1) for differential analysis of the dataset of Marioni et al.
    This dataset contains the counts of 32000 genes sequenced from liver and kidney cells of only one patient. For each condition (liver and kidney), the authors sequenced the samples on different lanes of the machine. This results in replication techniques, but not biological replicates.

    Following the directions of the vignette, I summed the counts of technical replicates of liver and kidney. So, now I have a sample for kidney and a sample for liver, for each gene.

    I'm trying to use the estimateDispersions function with the parameters method="blind" and sharingMode="fit-only".
    By doing so I get a warning: "In parametricDispersionFit(means, disps) : Dispersion fit did not converge."
    If I try to use the estimateDispersions function with the parameters method="blind", sharingMode="fit-only" and also fitType="local", the warning disappears.

    Is this a correct choice of parameters, with this dataset?

    Thanks

  • #2
    Yes, even though the results will still not be very meaningful.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks for the clarification, Simon.

      So fitType="local" may be safely used when fitType="parametric" does not fails?

      My doubt is because in the vignette (chapter "Working without Any replicates") you don't sum the counts of the pasilla dataset, but you arbitrarily choose to use only two samples (one per condition).
      You make this choice to "simulate" a dataset in which there isn't any kind of replicates?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Andrea Apolloni View Post
        So fitType="local" may be safely used when fitType="parametric" does not fails?
        Yes. This is what the warning recommends, and, actually, I am not even sure yet which fit type I'd prefer.

        My doubt is because in the vignette (chapter "Working without Any replicates") you don't sum the counts of the pasilla dataset, but you arbitrarily choose to use only two samples (one per condition).
        You make this choice to "simulate" a dataset in which there isn't any kind of replicates?
        Exactly.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • seqadmin
          Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
          by seqadmin


          Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
          04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
        • seqadmin
          Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
          by seqadmin


          Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
          03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
        0 responses
        30 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
        0 responses
        26 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
        0 responses
        52 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Working...
        X