Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • small ran seq illumina

    Hello,

    We just sequenced the banks you made from your NEBNext Small RNA kit.


    On the other hand, it is totally impossible for us to analyze the data, you can see that the sequences contain almost only N after demultiplexing, while the quality of the sequencing run is perfect.
    lam

  • #2
    You are going to need to provide more information than that to get useful help. If the reads only contain N's after demultiplexing then there is not much you can do but start diagnosing what went wrong. First with the run and then work backwards all the way to the sample prep, if needed.

    Comment


    • #3
      for the quality of the run it was very good,
      but the fastQ file contains almost 90% of N
      and no miRNA
      lam

      Comment


      • #4
        What sequencer was this run on? What kind of chemistry was used? If 90% of your reads at N's then that is not a good run.

        Comment


        • #5
          but the result of the run shows that it is of good quality it is a "miseq illumina"
          with a NEB bank preparation
          lam

          Comment


          • #6
            I just ran a MiSeq V3 150 cycles run (SR 50 bp only) with 12 libraries preparation with the "NEBNext Small RNA kit" from NEB. I also launched a adaptor trimming after the run (TruSeq adaptor).
            Library profils are OK :


            We have a problem because the run quality and demultiplexing are perfect to me.

            But when we look at the fastQ files (for all of the samples), samples have approximatly 1.5M raw reads but almost 90% of the sequences are "N" with a very bad Qscore.

            For example, I send you a sample fastQ file "86CorG1".
            Post trimming : sequences are +/- 35 bp long (what we are expected).
            Post filtration on a Q20 (to eliminate the "N" sequences) : 179.595 reads remained.
            After analysis on BaseSpase : no miRNA detected.

            Do you have an explanation for that? How is it possible that the quality run has a Q30 but the individual sample is at Q2-Q3 only?
            Can the problem came from the adaptor trimming?

            Thank you for your help,
            Best,
            lam

            Comment


            • #7
              Take a look at this thread, it addresses the same issue you are having.
              Bridged amplification & clustering followed by sequencing by synthesis. (Genome Analyzer / HiSeq / MiSeq)


              After trimming the adapters on the MiSeq you are left with short sequences that MiSeq Reporter masks with NNNs.
              Josh Kinman

              Comment


              • #8
                @josh: Thanks for the reminder.

                @[email protected]: Re-demux the run without the adapter sequence in SampleSheet. You can then remove the adapter sequences with a different program. I recommend bbduk.sh from BBMap suite with literal=your_RNA_adapter_sequence option.
                Last edited by GenoMax; 09-27-2017, 06:34 AM.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • seqadmin
                  Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
                  by seqadmin


                  The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
                  Yesterday, 07:01 AM
                • seqadmin
                  Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
                  by seqadmin


                  Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
                  04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
                0 responses
                55 views
                0 likes
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
                0 responses
                51 views
                0 likes
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
                0 responses
                45 views
                0 likes
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
                0 responses
                55 views
                0 likes
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Working...
                X