Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    That could be but I'm pretty sure you can't say that with any confidence. You can go from allele freqs to HWE expected genotypes but that's about it... And you can't test departure from HWE without your actual genotypes (like, not the pooled samples).

    Comment


    • #17
      60% of loci between all samples are shared, means out of all loci that are variable in any of my populations, 60% will be found in any other population. When you look at how the allele frequency varies, between the different populations, it slightly varies, meaning if it's 49/51 in one populations, it might be 45/55 in the other and 41/59 in the 3rd and 48/52 in the 4th and so on and so forth. I plotted it, it doesn't vary much. This means intra individual variation, not intra population variation.

      So you are right, I can't do anything with HWE. Which makes me wonder, can I actually calculate Fst for this.... What if I treat the entire spore population as 1 individual? I can calculate the variation within the population as if it was within that 1 individual, and then between the 6 populations?

      Comment


      • #18
        Not sure that I understand what you mean. So 60% of all of your loci are invariants? Or they're only variant in a single population? If that's true, as in, 4 pops are 100% 'A' and the fifth pop is 75% 'A', then that's actually okay and depending on the magnitude of the difference, that might be what you're even looking for.

        It totally depends on your experiment, but you might have to demonstrate that 49/51 is statistically different from 48/52, etc etc. Those sound like the same frequencies to me...

        I'm also not sure what you mean by "This means intra individual variation, not intra population variation." Sure, the within-pop freqs could be totally different (ex., 100 AAaa tetraploids in one pop, but 50 AAAA and 50 aaaa in the other) but you really can't tell those two situations apart from the data you have.

        Yes, you can still calc Fst -- but if your freqs within each pop are the same as the freqs among each pops then Fst will be around 0 (= no differentiation between pops.)

        I don't think treating the pop as one individual makes sense, but if it helps you conceptualize it then I guess go for it...

        Comment


        • #19
          For 60%, the allele frequencies are the same.

          However, there are population specific alleles. These should raise the Fst, right?

          Comment


          • #20
            I have a doubt about Fst from VCFtools.

            I used VCFtools to obtain Fst, but VCFtools generates 2 different Fst: mean and weighted.

            Which one is best to consider? In my cases these 2 Fst are very different. I asked the same question in the VCFtools forum and I had no reply. I think the weighted is better but I had very high values in this one.

            thanks
            Clarissa

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • seqadmin
              Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
              by seqadmin




              The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
              04-22-2024, 07:01 AM
            • seqadmin
              Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
              by seqadmin


              Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
              04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 08:47 AM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
            0 responses
            60 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
            0 responses
            60 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
            0 responses
            54 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Working...
            X