Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • velveth_de running time and mem

    Hi,

    I have a set of approx 200M reads that I would like to run on velvet.

    Could you please share your experience with velveth_de running time and mem consumption?

    Thanks

  • #2
    I guess I should be a bit more specific with the question

    I've tried to run velveth_de on that set of ~200M reads on local machine (quad core, 12Gb ram). 24h later it is still busy (nothing written to Roadmaps...).

    Has anybody similar experience? Tips?

    Thanks

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi Ori,

      There is the paper of Zhnag et al Practical comparison of de novo genome assembly
      also have a look at the wiki how to (http://seqanswers.com/wiki/How-to). This also links to a formula for RAM consumption which was posted in the velvet discussion list
      Maybe you can even add in your experience about velvet.

      Generally however one would need to know more about your genome coverage etc....

      Cheers,
      bjrön

      Comment


      • #4
        Thanks for the info!

        I see quite a few velvet runs in front of me, so if I have something interesting, I'll be glad to share

        Comment


        • #5
          We have opted for much less memory-hungry algorithms, like Abyss (a bit less friendly), SOAPDenovo, and CLC Bio. Every genome and every set and mixture of read types has different performance depending on the aligner, but at least with CLC Bio, SoapDenovo, etc. you can run many runs, alter parameters, because they are fast and much less memory-hungry...
          --------------------------------------
          Elia Stupka
          Co-Director and Head of Unit
          Center for Translational Genomics and Bioinformatics
          San Raffaele Scientific Institute
          Via Olgettina 58
          20132 Milano
          Italy
          ---------------------------------------

          Comment


          • #6
            A little update.

            I was running velveth with my set of reads on a bit bigger machine. Still, the memory usage peaked up to 72Gb, filling whole available ram and velvet got very very slow.
            So I will try another machine with even more muscles...

            I'm planning to try more assemblers during the project.
            About velvet and memory its consumption I just curious and intend to figure it out

            Comment


            • #7
              Ori - any updates? I'm running velveth on 12.5M reads, 10M are short, 2M are longer (mostly 454, some sanger).

              I did the 10M short reads on my workstation (16GB RAM) with no problem. Adding the extra 2M, I've been running for about a week with all of the RAM taken. I estimate about a week left in the run

              Comment


              • #8
                Hej ehscholl!

                Yes, I have some updates
                I filtered my read set rather harsh, reducing total count to approx 80M.
                velveth (k-mer 21 to 31) took 18h to complete, memory peaking at approx 90Gb
                velvetg took from 4h to 1h to complete, memory peaking at approx 30Gb

                Thanks for reminding to share the experience!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Ori - it would be very helpful if you said how big you expected your final genome to be and the expected coverage you have (also the length of your reads would be good).

                  Thanks.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    hej,

                    some info:
                    expected genome size 18-24mb
                    expected coverage 10-30x
                    reads 35bp

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Thanks for that Ori,

                      Comment

                      Latest Articles

                      Collapse

                      • seqadmin
                        Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
                        by seqadmin


                        Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
                        04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
                      • seqadmin
                        Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
                        by seqadmin


                        Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
                        03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

                      ad_right_rmr

                      Collapse

                      News

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
                      0 responses
                      24 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post seqadmin  
                      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
                      0 responses
                      25 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post seqadmin  
                      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
                      0 responses
                      23 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post seqadmin  
                      Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
                      0 responses
                      52 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post seqadmin  
                      Working...
                      X