View Single Post
Old 05-09-2011, 12:28 PM   #4
NearyJL78
Member
 
Location: San Antonio, Texas

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 14
Default

Also, its the second number (.93-.96 in your case) that you might be looking at. That represents the reproducibility of the experiment with you current conditions... if you look at the graph you can get an idea how many reads you need to have to reproduce your experiment completely. If that number is too low (on a scale of 0-1) you might want to consider additional sequencing of the same material. In your data it looks to be sufficient in my opinion.
NearyJL78 is offline   Reply With Quote