Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • tophat / bowtie mapping discrepancies

    I am mapping 50 bp SOLiD RNA-Seq reads to the mouse genome.

    When I use bowtie, I get ~60% mapping (I am running bowtie with -e 950 as has been suggested elsewhere for mapping SOLiD runs with bowtie)

    As there was no direct way to give tophat the -e option, I changed line 872 in the tophat python script from
    Code:
    bowtie_header_cmd = [bowtie_path, "--sam"]
    to
    Code:
    bowtie_header_cmd = [bowtie_path, "--sam", "-e 950"]
    When I run tophat with this option, I still get very poor mapping, of about 25%

    Why is there this discrepancy, as one would assume that all of the unspliced mapping that bowtie does should be reproducible by tophat ?

    Vineeth

  • #2
    Hi vineeth,

    Please verify with the author(s) if your way of passing "-e 950" from Tophat to Bowtie. From the Tophat manual, it has very limited options to pass parameters to Bowtie. The manual says Tophat is currently optimized for 75bp or longer SOLID reads. I am not sure what it actually means but it might have contributed to your observation.

    Douglas

    Comment


    • #3
      That really should not be an issue as this is the pythonic way (using the subprocess module) of building a command for executing something on the command-line.
      Further when I look at the run logs in the logs folder that TopHat creates, I see the bowtie command formed without issue.

      What I am wondering is since TopHat works serially by first aligning to the genome, then taking the unmapped reads and trying to align it to the splice junction which is where the read length matters (so even if the 75 bp recommendation makes a huge difference) I should only see an increase in mapping as opposed to just using bowtie; what confounds me is why I see the mapping decrease when compared to just using bowtie

      Comment


      • #4
        Hi Vineeth,

        Conceptually you are right but I am not sure how exactly tophat implements the concept. Again, please send your request to the tophat user forum or the author for a direct answer. At the same time, you may compare the mapping rates b/t Bowtie and Tophat without the option "-e 950" to see the trend? Occasionally these logical machines do illogical things.

        Douglas

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • seqadmin
          Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
          by seqadmin


          Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
          04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
        • seqadmin
          Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
          by seqadmin


          Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
          03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
        0 responses
        28 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
        0 responses
        52 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Working...
        X