Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Hi
    May please someone check my attached cuff_diff results. I have problem with high error bar and low FPKM value. Is there something wrong with sequencing or its a cufflinks problem?
    Second, there are only few genes in either samples (not in all) with 0 FPKM value; for example, control 3840.28 FPKM and treated 0 FPKM with Log2_fold_change=Inf. Attached File 0_FPKM.png Expression bar plot indicates high fold expression ? Can I ignore this one which seems significant ?

    Thank you very much

    Click image for larger version

Name:	1 csDensity.png
Views:	1
Size:	15.5 KB
ID:	304263

    Click image for larger version

Name:	csBoxplot_genes.png
Views:	1
Size:	11.6 KB
ID:	304264

    Click image for larger version

Name:	dispersionPlot_genes.png
Views:	1
Size:	22.5 KB
ID:	304265

    Click image for larger version

Name:	seq.png
Views:	3
Size:	13.3 KB
ID:	304266

    Click image for larger version

Name:	0_FPKM.png
Views:	1
Size:	6.2 KB
ID:	304267
    Last edited by jp.; 07-24-2013, 10:49 PM. Reason: adding info

    Comment


    • #47
      Cuffllinks variance, gene expression level and ifferential expression

      Hello ! which kind of sequencing was that - fragment or paired ends ? it changes a lot

      You have to look at the *count.tracking files and examine the count variance values

      There are instances (especially with fragment sequencing) for which the count variance is far greater than the counts - actually I would like to know from Cole wether this is somewhat expected

      Here is an example (see the values for q2), with the associated gene expression reported below - looks like for q2 a FPKM of 0 is calculated due to the enormous variance, am I right ?

      tracking_id q1_count q1_count_variance q1_count_uncertainty_var q1_count_dispersion_var q1_status q2_count q2_count_variance q2_count_uncertainty_var q2_count_dispersion_var q2_status

      GAPDH 308519 40753000 0 308519 OK 207559 10265500000 0 10265500000 OK


      test_id gene locus status MCF7 MCFS MCF7+MCFS log2(fold_change) test_stat p_value q_value significant

      NM_001256799 GAPDH chr12:6643584-6647537 OK 11.25 0.00 11.25 =-inf nan 0.00005 0.0142079 yes

      I am running software versions as follows on Color Space reads (so I have to stick to the old bowtie..)

      bowtie version 1.0.0
      TopHat v2.0.9
      cufflinks v2.1.1

      Thanks in advance for any feedback,

      Alessandro

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
        by seqadmin


        Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
        04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
      • seqadmin
        Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
        by seqadmin


        Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
        03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
      0 responses
      30 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
      0 responses
      32 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
      0 responses
      53 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X