Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Determining SPADEs Cx with multiple nodes

    I am hoping to determine the depth of coverage at each contig, but I'm hung up by the headers. Each contiguous sequence has a top line of:

    >NODE_1_length_56345_cov_1.86348

    Now, I know how to get coverage for this region using: Cx=Ck*L/(L-k+1)

    But, I'm confused as to why there are multiple NODE_1's. I hope to get total coverage for each contig, so how can I distinguish between multiple NODE_#'s?

  • #2
    There should only be a single node 1; if you see multiple, please report that to the devs. I don't personally recall ever seeing that happen.

    Also, you'll usually get a more accurate idea of the coverage by mapping the input reads to the assembly than from Spades' coverage value. For one thing, Spades is a multi-kmer assembler, so it's not even clear what k means in this context. But for another, well... mapping to calculate coverage is simply more accurate even for single-kmer assemblers.

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi Brian and thanks for responding to me, again! I think my egrep regex was appending all of the node_1's from all of my draft assemblies...So, what should I use to map my reads to the contigs-LASTz? The next step in my pipeline is to create larger scaffolds via a reference guided algorithm (ragout or pyscaf, do you have any recs?) and then compare outputs in mauve.

      PS thanks for bbmaps, I recommend it when I can.

      Comment


      • #4
        Since you are familiar with bbmap use it to map the original reads back to the contigs.

        Comment


        • #5
          To capture the per-contig coverage using BBMap, just add the flag "covstats=", e.g.:

          Code:
          bbmap.sh in=reads.fq ref=contigs.fa covstats=covstats.txt

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • seqadmin
            Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
            by seqadmin


            Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
            04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
          • seqadmin
            Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
            by seqadmin


            Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
            03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
          0 responses
          22 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
          0 responses
          16 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
          0 responses
          47 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Working...
          X