Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sureselect disappearing DNA

    Hello All

    We are doing the Sureselect protocol (XT all exon V4) with 3ug of DNA, after size selection we have around 1ug left for the end repair, A addition, adaptors and cleaning etc. Half of that then goes into the 6 cycles of PCR and we often have around 20uls x 30ng of DNA which is barely enough to go into the hyb.

    Is anyone seeing better concentrations at this stage or is that as good as it gets?

    Post hyb, after amplification we also have smallish yield (normally just enough for 1 run) is it worth doing more than the recommended 8 cycles of PCR at this stage so that we have library to come back to if we need to repeat or top up the sequence data? What concentration do you normally see after this 8 cycle PCR?

    Thanks
    JPC

  • #2
    Sounds like a few problems could be going on here based on my experience.

    1. ) Losses after shearing. Either you're not really putting 3ug in if you're losing that much after shearing, or your size selection is so severe that you're really losing 2/3 of your material (in addition to the purification losses). Probably related to quantitation (nanodrop) and there is a lot of degraded RNA in your gDNA and it's inflating your input concentrations. Have you ever just purified your input DNA and verified your recovery is >> 80% (Hint: if it's not, something is wrong either quantitation or technique-wise).

    2.) Overall yield seems low. My rule of thumb (Assuming you amplify your whole ligation)...is that you should end library prep with (at minimum) [ER input] * (0.8)^4. This represents 80% recovery (modest) from each AMPure (post ER, post AT, post ligation, and post pre-cap PCR), and assumes the precap PCR didn't even work (ie no ligation thus no amplification). If my yields are below this level, I don't even hyb the library.

    My math says that if you go into ER with 1ug, you should have 512ng at the post-ligation purification (0.8^3). Amplifying half of that (256ng) and eluting in 30ul should be 8.5ng/ul, so given your concentrations are 2.5x higher than that, it seems like that's within range for some successful amplification, but very low.

    For comparison, I put 5ug of high quality genomic DNA into the Covaris, take it through library prep (including a 1.2x size cut) and pre-cap amplification (of the whole ligation) for 6 cycles, elute in 30ul, and end up in the 300-400ng/ul range (with PCR dups in the <5% range). The yield is roughly linear with reduced input material, so we'd still be in the 150-200ng/ul range with 3ug input into shearing.

    Good luck! =]

    Comment


    • #3
      Many thanks for your reply. We run a gel, qubit and nanodrop for QC but there is less DNA in our sheared sample than expected so I'll try your recovery test suggestion...perhaps one of them is lying to me!

      I'm a little confused by one part of your reply as you seem to suggest you're not getting a big reduction when you size select? The AB protocol (p21) states that you expect an average yield of 30% (which is what we see) you don't seem to account for that and you point out that it's pretty severe, so I'm wondering if I am missing something?

      From your 5ug input DNA, with the size selection loss, you would have 5,000 * 0.3* (0.8)^4 = 30 ul @ 20.5ng/ul pre amp library (~600ng in total) then your 6 cycle PCR gives you 300-400ng/ul .... am I getting myself mixed up somewhere?

      Your help is much appreciated I hope I don't sound un-grateful!

      JPC
      Last edited by JPC; 11-15-2012, 07:01 AM. Reason: removed a broken link

      Comment


      • #4
        Hi JPC,

        I know this thread is very old but did what did you find after your recovery test? I am experiencing the same thing with my prep and can't figure out whats going on!

        Many thanks !

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • seqadmin
          Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
          by seqadmin


          Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
          04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
        • seqadmin
          Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
          by seqadmin


          Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
          03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
        0 responses
        52 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Working...
        X