Thread: BFAST published
View Single Post
Old 11-11-2009, 11:33 AM   #7
lh3
Senior Member
 
Location: Boston

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 693
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilshomer View Post
What panel are you looking at (sensitivity or false mapping)? Obviously the sensitivity cannot be 100% due to the repetitiveness of the human genome. For false-mapping, with no errors I don't see a >0% false mapping rate in Figure 3.
Unless sensitivity is too bad, I do not care too much about false negatives. I am looking at false positives (2nd column). At 0-mismatch/indel, both bwa and bowtie have ~6% error rate while others have 0%.

Quote:
We don't clip the reads. The "local alignment" we use is a global alignment to a window the candidate location. In other words, we enforce that the entire read must align to some subset of bases in the reference.
This is reassuring. Thanks for the explanation.
lh3 is offline   Reply With Quote