Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ABI Color Space to Bases

    Hi,

    I am trying to convert color space sequences generated by ABI SOLiD sequencer to actually bases using the following color space data "matrix":

    AA=0
    AC=1
    AG=2
    AT=3
    CC=0
    CA=1
    CT=2
    CG=3
    GG=0
    GT=1
    GA=2
    GC=3
    TT=0
    TG=1
    TC=2
    TA=3

    So, this
    >44_35_267_F3
    T20220213203000111000122223221121222

    gets converted to

    >44_35_267_F3
    CCTCCTGCTTAAAACACCCCAGAGATCTGTCAGAG

    I want to do this to be able to use alignment programs that cannot work with ABI color space data. But so far I think I am doing something wrong because my alignment rates are less than 5% using published data (allowing upto 2 mismatches, mouse genome).

    Any insights would be really appreciated.

    I may just go ahead and use MAQ to do this in color space but I am not sure why this does not work the way I am currently trying to doing it. I am very new to SOLiD data so I maybe missing some piece of information here.

    Thanks in advance.

  • #2
    SOLiD Alignment

    I have found that it is much better to do any analysis that you can in colorspace before you make the transition to DNA space. We are currently using the SHRiMP (U Toronto) alignment algorithm for fast and accurate alignment in colorspace. But even still 5% seems pretty low for DNA-space alignments of SOLiD data.

    Comment


    • #3
      Script available

      To answer your original question, just send me an email and I will provide you a python script that will convert .csfasta to .fasta as needed.

      Loyal
      lgoff(at)broad.mit.edu

      Comment


      • #4
        Lgoff,
        what advantage do you see with SHRiMP compared to the ABI tools? It is said to be very slow?

        sgupta,
        Direct conversion is not possible for reads that have any sequencing error since it will change all following bases in base space. Your coversion look correct though, but it is very common that sequences have at least one cs error. SOCS and ZOOM! are supposed to do colorspace alignments, perhaps worth a try.

        Comment


        • #5
          SOLiD

          Originally, I was very put off by the SOLiD pipeline. It was initially very closed and there wasn't much I could do outside of the genome resequencing for which it was originally designed. The matching is relatively fast with SOLiD, but I do like the k-mer+Smith-waterman approach of SHRiMP. While the SOLiD pipeline has become much more robust. When we received our original machine, with the original cluster, it was underpowered for anything human. We had to re-develop our own pipeline for the specific applications we were using SOLiD for (smRNAs at the time). So we went with SHRiMP, and I have stuck with it since. Since we are lucky enough to be able to parallelize everything very nicely, the speed is not terribly an issue for us. I haven't tried the SOLiD pipeline in the past few months. Am I missing any dramatic improvements?

          Comment


          • #6
            Hi Loyal,

            Can you share your strategy for parallel processing with SHRiMP?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by ECO View Post
              Can you share your strategy for parallel processing with SHRiMP?
              Parallelizing SHRiMP is as simple as splitting your input fasta/fastq file into smaller ones, running SHRiMP on each, then merging the hits output file.

              Nesoni (open source) does this automatically for you: http://www.vicbioinformatics.com/software.nesoni.shtml

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by sgupta View Post
                Hi,

                I am trying to convert color space sequences generated by ABI SOLiD sequencer to actually bases using the following color space data "matrix":

                AA=0
                AC=1
                AG=2
                AT=3
                CC=0
                CA=1
                CT=2
                CG=3
                GG=0
                GT=1
                GA=2
                GC=3
                TT=0
                TG=1
                TC=2
                TA=3

                So, this
                >44_35_267_F3
                T20220213203000111000122223221121222

                gets converted to

                >44_35_267_F3
                CCTCCTGCTTAAAACACCCCAGAGATCTGTCAGAG

                I want to do this to be able to use alignment programs that cannot work with ABI color space data. But so far I think I am doing something wrong because my alignment rates are less than 5% using published data (allowing upto 2 mismatches, mouse genome).

                Any insights would be really appreciated.

                I may just go ahead and use MAQ to do this in color space but I am not sure why this does not work the way I am currently trying to doing it. I am very new to SOLiD data so I maybe missing some piece of information here.

                Thanks in advance.
                You can also do the conversion directly on our web server:
                http://genome.ucla.edu/bfast-server/. Click on the left tab that says CS2NT/NT2CS and enjoy!

                I would recommend aligning in color space since one color error will cause all bases after the color error to be translated incorrectly. Many great color space aware mapping tools exist.

                Nils

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • seqadmin
                  Recent Advances in Sequencing Analysis Tools
                  by seqadmin


                  The sequencing world is rapidly changing due to declining costs, enhanced accuracies, and the advent of newer, cutting-edge instruments. Equally important to these developments are improvements in sequencing analysis, a process that converts vast amounts of raw data into a comprehensible and meaningful form. This complex task requires expertise and the right analysis tools. In this article, we highlight the progress and innovation in sequencing analysis by reviewing several of the...
                  05-06-2024, 07:48 AM
                • seqadmin
                  Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
                  by seqadmin




                  The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
                  04-22-2024, 07:01 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by seqadmin, 05-10-2024, 06:35 AM
                0 responses
                20 views
                0 likes
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Started by seqadmin, 05-09-2024, 02:46 PM
                0 responses
                26 views
                0 likes
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Started by seqadmin, 05-07-2024, 06:57 AM
                0 responses
                21 views
                0 likes
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Started by seqadmin, 05-06-2024, 07:17 AM
                0 responses
                21 views
                0 likes
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Working...
                X