View Single Post
Old 04-24-2012, 05:13 PM   #10
pmiguel
Senior Member
 
Location: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,315
Default

About Nick's paper. Anyone else think that the MiSeq got sandbagged? Especially in comparison to the GS-Jr. Only 10% of a MiSeq run was used for the assembly. (And, mysteriously, 1/2 of that ended up mapping to one of the plasmids.) With ABySS I have seen improvements in contig/scaffold lengths up to 100x coverage.

--
Phillip
pmiguel is offline   Reply With Quote