View Single Post
Old 03-07-2017, 09:13 PM   #10
atcghelix
Member
 
Location: CA

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 74
Default

Are you sure they subtracted the adapter length from the fragment sizes to get the insert sizes (meaning, are you sure they're reporting insert size from the bioanalyzer?)? If the fragments themselves are an average of 600bp with a fairly wide distribution, it wouldn't be surprising if 60% of your reads merged with 150bp PE.

That said, we've (very rarely) had libraries that gave drastically different results between bioanalyzer, fragment analyzer, and tapestation, with the empirical insert size distributions determined after sequencing not agreeing with any of them.
atcghelix is offline   Reply With Quote