View Single Post
Old 11-16-2015, 12:00 PM   #2
skbrimer
Member
 
Location: OP Kansas

Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 53
Default

Your data looks pretty normal for Ion Torrent. I do not use proton data since I'm in the low throughput microbe world. There are a couple of things going on here in your question.

First, your guess about the fastqc values not being equivalent are correct. there is a thread about it here http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=33555 In my experience I have good quality data but my average Q score is in the range of 28-32, it seems to be a "depressed" score. It should be able to show you if your data takes a nose dive however.

Second the different sample sequences has more to due with the library prep then the tech. In general you make your library, normalize to 100uM ea, and then pool from there. If your samples are way out of balance it's most likely to that step either being skipped or just not done with a lot of accuracy.

For your differential analysis question, I'm sorry I'm not sure how to help you. I'm not really doing any of that type of work currently. Also there is a lot of information missing about the experiment to really get into it; however if you are doing whole transcriptome sequencing and each sample's library was prepped the same way wouldn't you be comparing some sort of transformed data? Like sample 1 has 2 fold diff and sample 3 has 4 fold diff with same treatment.
skbrimer is offline   Reply With Quote