View Single Post
Old 09-26-2012, 12:44 AM   #2
fkrueger
Senior Member
 
Location: Cambridge, UK

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 625
Default

Hi Elsie,

66% mapping efficiency doesn't sound too bad, but could you give us some more information about your data such as read length, whether it was single or paired-end, the mapping parameters used or also the number of sequence that did not map at all or mapped ambiguously (this should be stated in the mapping report)?
fkrueger is offline   Reply With Quote