Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gorbenzer
    Member
    • Apr 2012
    • 45

    16S metagenomics, how much data needed?

    Hi everyone,
    i'm starting a 16S metagenomic analysis using Ion Torrent sequencer...

    We need to decide what chip is better to use...

    314 that gives around 40Mbp of 200bp data?
    316 that gives aroung 200Mbp of 200bp data?
    318 that gives around 1Gbp of 200bp data?


    How much data is usually required for a good rapresentation of a sample microbial 16S population?

    Thanks to everyone that will help
  • Jean
    Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 37

    #2
    It depends on what the population is (how diverse for example), and how "deep" you want to sequence (do you care about rare bugs?)

    Comment

    • Gorbenzer
      Member
      • Apr 2012
      • 45

      #3
      Hi,
      we need to evaluate intestinal microbiota from fecal samples, so quite high complexity... and identify rare bugs would be appreciated.

      I can't find any paper about 16S metagenomics based on Ion Torrent PGM and having an idea of the amount of data needed would help us to reduce the number of runs (and the amount of money) needed to find the best settings.

      Thank you for your help.

      Comment

      • gringer
        David Eccles (gringer)
        • May 2011
        • 845

        #4
        we need to evaluate intestinal microbiota from fecal samples, so quite high complexity... and identify rare bugs would be appreciated.
        In that case, the general rule of thumb is "as much data as possible given the money and time constraints". That's probably going to be the 318 unless there's a much greater chance of a failed run due to a newer system.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        12 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...