Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • danf1985
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 1

    small amount of DNA material for Helicos?

    We tried Helicos for ChIP-Seq with small amount of DNA (less than 1ng). As it claimed, Helicos should work well with small amount of DNA samples, yet it did not seem to be the case. What is your experience and how do you think about this?

    We are currently using Illumina, but has been interested in Helicos for the reason that it claims to be more accurate and use less material (sometimes we don't get a lot of DNA out of ChIP). However, the more I learned about it, the more concerns I have. It does not seem to be as good as they advertise. The sample prep is not very easy, and the results is not that accurate, or at least not really superior to Illumina. The reads are short compared with Illumina. And it would be a big investment with one machine, 1 million dollars. What's your opinion?
  • angelawu
    Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 12

    #2
    I currently use Helicos for my low quantity samples (picogram level) and it is working far better than Illumina. The reason is because the tSMS allows you to get individual reads, whereas for Illumina I get jackpotting (that is, repeated reads from the same DNA fragment) from the pcr amplification I have to do to get enough DNA for the GA, whereas for Helicos, I don't do any amplification... Also the end repair and ligation for Illumina library prep has not worked well for me. It appears much less effficient than the Helicos library prep polyA tail method, and caused my DNA to be lost in the library prep process. Let me know if this makes sense. For me the Helicos wins by far for small quantity DNA sequencing.

    If you are doing ChIP-seq, the quality of the DNA can highly affect the sequencing outcome as well...

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    7 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    12 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...