Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lletourn
    Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 63

    Rarefaction distance explanation

    I have 16s data (target: 96F 1492R) that was run on 454. The results are very good. I used ESpirit and mothur on the data to get Chao1 good's coverage and rarefaction graphs.

    I was just wondering if any one of you knows of a publication/books which goes into details explaining why the distances 0.01, 0.03-0.05, 0.1 are very 'important' as diversity markers.

    I deduced that 0.01 means that the OTUs are of the same species
    0.03-0.05 are of the same family/genus
    0.1 same phylum/class

    But I can't find any clear cut study on those numbers.

    thanks
  • cliffbeall
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 144

    #2
    I think those are just heuristics. I have heard 1% for strain/subspecies and 3% for species, but those definitions are fluid.

    Here is a review:
    Pace, N. R. (2009). "Mapping the tree of life: progress and prospects." Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 73(4): 565-76.

    Comment

    • lletourn
      Member
      • Oct 2009
      • 63

      #3
      I know you answered this awhile ago, but thanks a lot, it's exactly the kind of article I was looking for.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...