Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PaulineF
    Member
    • Jul 2008
    • 15

    SE adapters and PE primers

    As dumb as this sounds, can someone please tell me if PE primers can work with SE adapters to successfully generate PE data? We suspect this combination may have occurred on 3 occasions but each time there was a different outcome: only read 1 worked (GAII, long time ago), both reads generated clusters and went through the pipeline without errors, and no clusters at all (latter 2 on GAIIx, SCS2.5).
    I checked some helpful diagrams provided by this group and it looks like it should not have worked at all. But I cannot explain our 3 different results, so any help will be greatly appreciated.
  • Michael.James.Clark
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 207

    #2
    I do not think it should work because the sequences of the PE adapters are different from the SE adapters if I remember correctly.
    Mendelian Disorder: A blogshare of random useful information for general public consumption. [Blog]
    Breakway: A Program to Identify Structural Variations in Genomic Data [Website] [Forum Post]
    Projects: U87MG whole genome sequence [Website] [Paper]

    Comment

    • PaulineF
      Member
      • Jul 2008
      • 15

      #3
      Yes, exactly, the SE and PE adapters and primer 1's are different. However, after taking a closer look, because the the PE1 primer differs from the SE1 primer only by having that insert, so PE1 could potentially hybridize to the SE adapter by looping out the insert. Once that 1st strand is amplified, then SE2 and PE2 are the same so the PCR can continue. This would be consistent with the lower than expected cluster densities with the suspected run that did generate both read1 and read2 data. Although, even I am not convinced that this explains our results. If hybridization and PCR efficiency are both by chance, it's pretty amazing that we got consistent results between each batch of samples.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      18 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      21 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...