Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SpreeFu
    Member
    • Dec 2012
    • 24

    #46
    Hi all, is it possible to count the reads mapping to a specific region of a gene from the accepted_hit.bam?
    Thanks a lot!

    Comment

    • nicrob
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2013
      • 4

      #47
      I attempted to explain this here: http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=29621

      Originally posted by pengchy View Post
      Hi all,

      According to the description of the output file genes.fpkm_tracking of cuffdiff, the value of *_FPKM is larger than *_conf_lo and smaller than *_conf_hi. But in my results, 12257 of 91991 transcripts in one sample have FPKM larger than both conf_lo and conf_hi. Is it normal?

      The cufflinks version 2.1.1 was used.

      Comment

      • jordiabante
        Junior Member
        • Sep 2015
        • 1

        #48
        Hi Cole,

        I tried to reproduce the results in the paper "Differential gene and transcript expression analaysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks" but using TopHat2 and Cufflinks2 instead. According to the volcano plot generated by cummeRbund (built on R 3.2.2) there are no significant differences. However, there're a bunch of genes above -log10(p-value)=2 and distant from log2(fold change)=0 in it.

        Please, I would really appreciate if you could give me some feedback on this.

        - Jordi

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        28 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        26 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...