Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • epibio
    Registered Vendor
    • May 2010
    • 89

    #31
    Considering that rRNA constituted 99% of your sample, 50-70 ng of rRNA-depleted RNA is in line with the expected yield. This would be sufficient to prepare an RNA-Seq library. For example, our ScriptSeq v2 library prep kit requires 500 pg to 50 ng input RNA (either poly(A) or rRNA-depleted).

    What method are you using to quantify the RNA after Ribo-Zero treatment?
    Connect with Epicentre: Facebook | Twitter

    Comment

    • msdl
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2012
      • 3

      #32
      In fact, when I was saying a depleting grade of 99% it was reffered to the peak area of the rRNA in the analysis profile you got in a bioanalyzer system, so I don't know exactly the rRNA percentage of my sample.

      Another problem is that the company, which is going to develop the cDNA library and to sequence it, is using a SOLID system, so that kit you offer me is not compatible... isn't it?

      We're quantifying the RNA with a flourimeter, so, in principle, it isn't overestimated, like the quantification Nanodrop gives to you (that was another problem we had in the begining...).

      Another thing is that because of a initial bad quantification we got with the fluorimeter, some of the quantifications were underestimated and we have succesfully depleted the rRNA even using 8 ug instead of 5 ug... Anyway, the yield wasn't enough (in the majority of the samples it was around 50-70 ng...not depending whether the sample was 5 ug or 8ug).

      What about the "tricky" idea I asked about? This assay is for a comparative transcriptome among different enviromental conditions the strain is suffering and we don't want to be wasting so much money in all the kit we've been wasting because the low yield we got.

      Thank you

      Comment

      • epibio
        Registered Vendor
        • May 2010
        • 89

        #33
        You're right that the ScriptSeq method will not be compatible with SOLiD.

        If you are having yield problems with a Ribo-Zero kit, I would be concerned that the same problems would occur if you use Ribo-Zero after the MicrobeExpress kit. I'd like to troubleshoot the low yields some more. Can you contact our Tech Support staff directly, and we can determine if there is a kit-specific problem? Thanks.
        Connect with Epicentre: Facebook | Twitter

        Comment

        • msdl
          Junior Member
          • Mar 2012
          • 3

          #34
          Yes, It could be the same problem, but the idea is to start with less percentage of rRNA in a similar quantity of initial RNA (5ug) to avoid that yield problem.

          Do you think that tricky idea would affect the quality of the mRNA making the assay of the transcriptome not trustful?

          Comment

          • epibio
            Registered Vendor
            • May 2010
            • 89

            #35
            Especially with an international shipment, there could be issues with shipping and storage that may cause problems, which is why I suggested more extensive troubleshooting with tech support. If there is, in fact, a problem with the kit, it would affect yields regardless of the type of sample used as input.
            Connect with Epicentre: Facebook | Twitter

            Comment

            • pmiguel
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2008
              • 2328

              #36
              Originally posted by msdl View Post
              Another problem is that the company, which is going to develop the cDNA library and to sequence it, is using a SOLID system, so that kit you offer me is not compatible... isn't it?
              The new protocol for the SOLiD Whole Transcriptome Kit has a "low input RNA" protocol that works with 5-25 ng of input RNA. So they could just use that, right?


              --
              Phillip

              Comment

              • epibio
                Registered Vendor
                • May 2010
                • 89

                #37
                Yes, that would work for SOLiD.
                Connect with Epicentre: Facebook | Twitter

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
                0 responses
                6 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                0 responses
                11 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                0 responses
                19 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                0 responses
                53 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...