Tweet
Maybe, MGISEQ is better.
-
-
Done! Two years late! -
For what it's worth (there's very littel traffic here anyway):
I think this should be renamed back to Complete Genomics, and a new forum should be created for MGISEQ instruments. Most of the questions/answers here are either 1) not relevant to MGI or CG, or 2) they're CG-data/analysis specific questions. The MGI instruments have basically thrown away all the sequencing technology used by CG, and only the Nanoball/'clustering' method is retained. The instruments are quite different too.
Cheers,
Scott.Comment
-
I agree with you. Now the naming should be changed to DNBSEQ according to the company website.Originally posted by ECO View Post
Comment
-
Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.
The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
...06-02-2026, 10:05 AM -
With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.
Introduction
Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...05-22-2026, 06:42 AM
Comment