Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Anelda
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 30

    LifeScope Genomic Analysis Solutions

    Hi there,

    I am trying to find out what the community thinks of the SOLiD software. Does anyone have experience using it? How does it compare with something like Galaxy (except, of course that it's not open source, extendible, etc).

    Our local sequencing service provider have purchased a license and we would like to know what other software (open source or commercial) he would need to point his clients to for downstream analysis.

    Any comments welcome!

    Thanks,
    Anelda
  • seq_lover
    Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 18

    #2
    Lifescope comes with all the tertiary analysis (SNP calling, indel, annotation) modules. They have a very nice mapping analysis. I was able to map ~75-85% of total reads to ref genome at mapping quality of 20. The organism sequenced is sub strain of the reference organism. Few problems I faced and still facing:

    1) If you run big dataset then lifescope gives time-out error. Sometimes if you are lucky it will finish the job without any problem. We have installed a powerful cluster with 12 nodes and 192 processors and with each node having 1 TB space and local scratch. But still sometime lifescope fails to run a moderate job.

    2) CNV analysis is only for human genome? so you cant use it for rat or mouse.

    3) Lifescope produces one bam file for each lane of data. Somewhere in the manual they say that you should not merge those bam files. I dont know what to do if I need to use some third party tool for my analysis that requires one big bam file.

    4) No third party tools are required for installation. It comes with all the dependencies but you should have required cluster system.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    16 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    17 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...