Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mscholz
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 13

    Bowtie2 shared memory (--mm)

    Anyone knows how this bad boy works? The manual is less than informative.

    How do different threads know the shared memory is there? What's the deal???

    Help?
  • nilshomer
    Nils Homer
    • Nov 2008
    • 1283

    #2
    Originally posted by mscholz View Post
    Anyone knows how this bad boy works? The manual is less than informative.

    How do different threads know the shared memory is there? What's the deal???

    Help?
    I would presume that the main thread memory maps the index file so that the index is treated as though it is in primary memory. Then the main thread needs only give a pointer to this memory to each thread. This is no different than if it had just read the index into memory. That's the beauty of memory mapping, as it is as though the file is in memory from the point of view of the process.

    For shared memory, typically a key is used to associate a shared memory segment (google shmget for example). Given this key, a process can attach the shared memory to its own process memory.

    Comment

    • tonybolger
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 156

      #3
      Originally posted by mscholz View Post
      Anyone knows how this bad boy works? The manual is less than informative.

      How do different threads know the shared memory is there? What's the deal???

      Help?
      It's magic

      Seriously though, it's probably just memory mapping the index files (via mmap). The OS can automatically share multiple mappings to the same file from different processes, so it allocates RAM for only one copy in memory.

      BTW, threads within one bowtie process automatically share their memory, this only saves memory when running multiple bowtie processes.

      *edit: beaten to it

      Comment

      • mscholz
        Member
        • May 2010
        • 13

        #4
        So,

        I'm back to this. My question is this, how on earth would I call bowtie2 using multiple read sets on the -mm flagged index so that I don't have to keep reloading the same index? Do I have to run it with parallel? I'm just not clear at all on how you get two disparate calls of the same index to share the memory mapping info...

        Thanks!

        Comment

        • arolfe
          Member
          • Jul 2011
          • 29

          #5
          it should just work

          You add the --mm flag to the command line. If there's only one copy of bowtie2 using that index on the machine, there shouldn't be any change. If there are multiple copies of bowtie2 running at the same time and using the same index, the total RAM use will be less as the operating system will only have one copy of the index in memory. You shouldn't notice any difference otherwise.

          Yes, this only helps if you're running multiple instances of bowtie2 at once.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            Today, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            Yesterday, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          7 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          6 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          9 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          31 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...