Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sbaheti
    Member
    • Jul 2010
    • 12

    tool to merge pileup

    hi

    I need to merge pileup from multiple samples, do we have an open source tool to merge multiple pileups.

    Thanks

    Saurabh
  • mgolo
    Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 10

    #2
    Hi!

    I have the same question Saurabh. I have 3 biological replicates and i would like to normalize them before i merge their pileup files. Does anyone have a clue for this?

    Thanks in advance!

    Maria

    Comment

    • gringer
      David Eccles (gringer)
      • May 2011
      • 845

      #3
      For a basic merge, 'samtools mpileup ' will do this:



      It displays different columns for each sample; I'm not sure if that is what you want.

      Comment

      • mgolo
        Member
        • Apr 2011
        • 10

        #4
        Originally posted by gringer View Post
        For a basic merge, 'samtools mpileup ' will do this:



        It displays different columns for each sample; I'm not sure if that is what you want.
        Hi! Thanks for your fast reply

        I don´t think this is what i need. I would like to merge 3 biological replicates' results into one single file. Basically for each count calculate the mean of the 3 runs. But before doing that i need to normalize somehow the 3 files, as they have different coverages. Maybe i have to do this before creating the pileup files... Any idea?

        Comment

        • gringer
          David Eccles (gringer)
          • May 2011
          • 845

          #5
          I don't think this is what i need. I would like to merge 3 biological replicates' results into one single file. Basically for each count calculate the mean of the 3 runs. But before doing that i need to normalize somehow the 3 files, as they have different coverages. Maybe i have to do this before creating the pileup files... Any idea?
          mpileup is the only hammer I know (I'm very new to this), so take this with a grain of salt....

          mpileup gives raw count data for each run, so you can extract those columns as your raw coverages per sample. I would then normalise by dividing by some statistic from the counts per column (e.g. 75th percentile). Here's a quick R script that does this:

          Code:
          # read in pileup data
          data.df <- read.delim("mpileup_lane1-6.csv", sep = "\t", header = FALSE,
                                col.names = c("isoform","pos","flag",paste(c("count","seq","qual"),rep(1:6,each=3),sep="_")));
          pos.counts <- cbind(isoform = data.df$isoform,pos = data.df$pos,data.df[,paste("count",1:6,sep="_")]);
          # rough normalisation of count data
          quantile.counts <- apply(pos.counts[,3:8],2,quantile, p=0.75);
          quantile.counts <- quantile.counts / min(quantile.counts);
          pos.counts[,3:8] <- t(t(pos.counts[,3:8]) / quantile.counts);
          pos.counts$mean <- apply(pos.counts[,3:8],1,mean);
          A more complex *PKM-style normalisation would need to take into account the transcript sizes for each hit, so you'd use something like cufflinks/DEseq/whatever to get *PKM values for each transcript, then divide by that value. I'm not sure if going that far would be necessary, given that they should be hitting transcripts with a similar relative frequency.

          Comment

          • mgolo
            Member
            • Apr 2011
            • 10

            #6
            Thank you gringer!

            I think you are right about the normalization, no need to take into account transcript sizes

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
              by SEQadmin2


              Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

              The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
              ...
              07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            14 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            31 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            42 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            28 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...