Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zippered_ohio
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 6

    SAMtools pileup output

    Hi all,

    I have used SAMtools pileup in order to identify indels. According to this page, there should be 13 columns.

    My output has 15 columns, and most of the lines make sense, e.g.:

    Code:
    chr1	107591963	*	*/-TC	69	69	59	91	*	-TC	86	5	0	0	0
    I assumed that the sum of columns 11, 12, and 13 would equal column 8. This holds for most of the indels, but I noticed it doesn't hold for all.

    There are certain regions with very high read depths and which do not satisfy (c11+c12+c13)==c8. Example:

    Code:
    chr2	98507236	*	*/*	2652	0	28	7999	*	-T	1019	5	0	0	0
    chr2	98507238	*	*/*	2619	0	28	8001	*	-G	1022	1	1	1	964
    chr2	98507239	*	*/*	2800	0	28	8000	*	-A	1017	6	1	0	0
    chr2	98507245	*	*/*	2947	0	28	7990	*	-G	1022	2	0	0	0
    chr2	98507247	*	*/*	2990	0	29	7998	*	-C	1021	3	0	0	0
    chr2	98507249	*	*/*	3016	0	29	7992	*	-A	1023	1	0	0	0
    When I view this region in IGV (screenshot), it looks poorly mapped but definitely not read depths of ~10k.

    Any ideas on why this might be?
  • nilshomer
    Nils Homer
    • Nov 2008
    • 1283

    #2
    Pileup is no longer in the new release, try using "mpileup" as you will have trouble be finding support.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    12 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    14 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...