Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kjsalimian
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2011
    • 5

    Illumina Paired End FASTQ

    Hi guys,

    I'm very new to this. I have a paired end data set from HiSeq1000. I want to take the first 10,000 or 100,000 reads out of ~40mil reads to use for tests rather than putting the entire 40 mil reads through the tests.

    What is the easiest way to generate files of only the first 100,000 reads??

    Thanks.
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    I'm not really familar with HiSeq data foramts, but there are probably some kind of coordinates, maybe by tile. If the data below from the checked answer is correct, you could use a grep to get only the entries with '[sequencer name]_[run]:[lane]:10:'. That's be a fairly random.

    Or simpler, head -400000 to get the top 1000k reads?

    The ones in the very beginning are probably at the edge of the flow-cell, and will have more bad quality reads. Pulling from the middle might get you more good reads.


    Comment

    • dpryan
      Devon Ryan
      • Jul 2011
      • 3478

      #3
      Have a look at this thread. You'll often find that the first batch of reads in a file are crap (at least from some machines), so you're better off randomly selecting them.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      26 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...