Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Newsbot!
    Banned
    • Feb 2008
    • 1331

    PubMed: De novo DNA synthesis using single-molecule PCR.

    Syndicated from PubMed RSS Feeds

    De novo DNA synthesis using single-molecule PCR.

    Methods Mol Biol. 2012;852:35-47

    Authors: Yehezkel TB, Linshiz G, Shapiro E

    Abstract
    The throughput of DNA reading (i.e., sequencing) has dramatically increased recently owing to the incorporation of in vitro clonal amplification. The throughput of DNA writing (i.e., synthesis) is trailing behind, with cloning and sequencing constituting the main bottleneck. To overcome this bottleneck, an in vitro alternative for in vivo DNA cloning needs to be integrated into DNA synthesis methods. Here, we show how a new single-molecule PCR (smPCR)-based procedure can be employed as a general substitute for in vivo cloning, thereby allowing for the first time in vitro DNA synthesis. We integrated this rapid and high fidelity in vitro procedure into our previously described recursive DNA synthesis and error correction procedure and used it to efficiently construct and error-correct a 1.8-kb DNA molecule from synthetic unpurified oligonucleotides, entirely in vitro. Although we demonstrate incorporating smPCR in a particular method, the approach is general and can be used, in principle, in conjunction with other DNA synthesis methods as well.


    PMID: 22328424 [PubMed - in process]



    More...

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
0 responses
7 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
11 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
19 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
53 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...