Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jjjscuedu
    Member
    • Mar 2012
    • 35

    trinity error

    I try to run the trinity for my RNA-seq dataset, but get the following errors:

    CMD finished (0 seconds)
    CMD: /diag/software/trinityrnaseq_r2012-03-17/Inchworm/bin/inchworm --kmers meryl.kmers.min1.fa --run_inchworm -K 25 -L 48 --monitor 1 > /diag/home/jjin/rice/leaf/test/inchworm.K25.L48.fa.tmp
    /diag/software/trinityrnaseq_r2012-03-17/Inchworm/bin/inchworm: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.11' not found (required by /diag/software/trinityrnaseq_r2012-03-17/Inchworm/bin/inchworm)
    /diag/software/trinityrnaseq_r2012-03-17/Inchworm/bin/inchworm: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by /diag/software/trinityrnaseq_r2012-03-17/Inchworm/bin/inchworm)
    Error, cmd: /diag/software/trinityrnaseq_r2012-03-17/Inchworm/bin/inchworm --kmers meryl.kmers.min1.fa --run_inchworm -K 25 -L 48 --monitor 1 > /diag/home/jjin/rice/leaf/test/inchworm.K25.L48.fa.tmp died with ret 256 at /diag/software/trinityrnaseq_r2012-03-17/Trinity.pl line 1092.

    ** The inchworm process failed. Below is the tail end of the log file:

    I don't know why i get this error.
    Can anysone give me some suggestions?

    Jingjing
  • BenjaminL
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 5

    #2
    compilation errors

    Hallo Jingjing!

    > /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.11' not found

    means that the inchworm application is missing a library of the required version. This is a standard system library used for running applications written in c++.

    Most likely the app needs to be recompiled on your system. Or if there is a configuration file, shell variables, etc. that can be changed to match the location of your library files, then that could work.

    Did you compile inchworm on your machine, or download it pre-compiled?
    Benjamin
    Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine

    Comment

    • MalcolmHoutz
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2014
      • 4

      #3
      Trinity can't find /1 or /2 on many reads

      Hi - I am assembling reads using Trinity, which requires a /1 or /2 appended to each left or right hand end of paired reads.
      I appended the /1 and /2 using a perl script, checked my work and let it fly. Trinity complains it can't decipher the /1 or /2 on many reads. It prints the read identifier out for the first 10, then gives a count of the total.

      I grepped the offending records from both the /1 and /2 fastq's, and they look fine.
      Any thoughts?

      Here are the warnings from a tiny test run:

      CMD: rm bowtie.out
      CMD: /share/apps/trinityrnaseq/20131110/Chrysalis//../util/scaffold_iworm_contigs.pl bowtie.nameSorted.sam /scratch/mlh476/rice_project/AZUCENA_trinity_output/inchworm.K25.L25.fa > iworm_scaffolds.txt
      warning, ignoring read: HWI-ST911:1412AWEACXX:4:1101:10008:2437 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
      warning, ignoring read: HWI-ST911:1412AWEACXX:4:1101:10030:2102 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
      warning, ignoring read: HWI-ST911:1412AWEACXX:4:1101:10030:2948 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
      warning, ignoring read: HWI-ST911:1412AWEACXX:4:1101:10044:2925 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
      warning, ignoring read: HWI-ST911:1412AWEACXX:4:1101:10044:2925 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
      warning, ignoring read: HWI-ST911:1412AWEACXX:4:1101:10045:2126 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
      warning, ignoring read: HWI-ST911:1412AWEACXX:4:1101:10066:2279 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
      warning, ignoring read: HWI-ST911:1412AWEACXX:4:1101:10071:2111 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
      warning, ignoring read: HWI-ST911:1412AWEACXX:4:1101:10079:2494 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
      warning, ignoring read: HWI-ST911:1412AWEACXX:4:1101:10082:2037 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
      warning, ignoring read: HWI-ST911:1412AWEACXX:4:1101:10082:2037 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
      number of read warnings exceeded 10. Turning off warning messages from here out.
      WARNING: note there were 2829 reads that could not be deciphered as being /1 or /2 of a PE fragment. Hopefully, these were SE reads that should have been ignored. Otherwise, please research this further.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      53 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...