Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • choy
    Member
    • Jul 2009
    • 14

    #1

    TopHat and Multireads - what is happening under the hood?

    Hi all -

    I have had success so far with TopHat, and it is a great tool!

    My RNA-seq workflow is to run TopHat and then Cufflinks. Recently, I noticed that some of the transcripts that are produced are "false positives" due to multi-mapped reads. In otherwords, the vast majority of coverage (RPKM) in those transcripts due to reads that map to multiple locations.

    I could eliminate all of these false positives by setting TopHat's (-g/--max-multihits) option to '1', but I would rather not do this because it would sacrifice sensitivity in exchange for guaranteed uniqueness.

    Ideally, I want to be able to know some statistics about how many of the reads in each transcript came from multi-mapping vs. uniquely mapping reads. Is there any information in the 'accepted_hits.sam' file about this? What about in any of the other temporary files that TopHat generates.

    How does everyone else handle multi-mapping reads and TopHat?

    Also, in the SAM output file, I noticed that the mate pair reference is always set to '=' even if the two mates map to different references.

    Finally, would it be possible to add the 'insert size' parameter to the accepted_hits.sam file?

    Best regards, and thanks again!
  • MerFer
    Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 21

    #2
    Originally posted by choy View Post
    Hi all -
    Also, in the SAM output file, I noticed that the mate pair reference is always set to '=' even if the two mates map to different references.

    Finally, would it be possible to add the 'insert size' parameter to the accepted_hits.sam file?

    Best regards, and thanks again!
    In tophat manual there is already an option for the expected inner distance between mate pairs. I think, it would help you.

    -r/--mate-inner-dist <int> This is the expected (mean) inner distance between mate pairs. For, example, for paired end runs with fragments selected at 300bp, where each end is 50bp, you should set -r to be 200. There is no default, and this parameter is required for paired end runs.

    Best
    Meryem

    Comment

    • choy
      Member
      • Jul 2009
      • 14

      #3
      Originally posted by MerFer View Post
      In tophat manual there is already an option for the expected inner distance between mate pairs. I think, it would help you.

      -r/--mate-inner-dist <int> This is the expected (mean) inner distance between mate pairs. For, example, for paired end runs with fragments selected at 300bp, where each end is 50bp, you should set -r to be 200. There is no default, and this parameter is required for paired end runs.

      Best
      Meryem
      Thanks Meryem. I am actually setting this parameter already. However, even though we pass the expected inner distance to TopHat, each individual mate pair will have its own insert size when mapped.

      I suppose that since TopHat maps to the human genome, it is not possible to approximate the actually insert size until transcript assembly is complete.

      Best regards,

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      42 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      32 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      44 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      45 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...