Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • choy
    Member
    • Jul 2009
    • 14

    #1

    TopHat and Multireads - what is happening under the hood?

    Hi all -

    I have had success so far with TopHat, and it is a great tool!

    My RNA-seq workflow is to run TopHat and then Cufflinks. Recently, I noticed that some of the transcripts that are produced are "false positives" due to multi-mapped reads. In otherwords, the vast majority of coverage (RPKM) in those transcripts due to reads that map to multiple locations.

    I could eliminate all of these false positives by setting TopHat's (-g/--max-multihits) option to '1', but I would rather not do this because it would sacrifice sensitivity in exchange for guaranteed uniqueness.

    Ideally, I want to be able to know some statistics about how many of the reads in each transcript came from multi-mapping vs. uniquely mapping reads. Is there any information in the 'accepted_hits.sam' file about this? What about in any of the other temporary files that TopHat generates.

    How does everyone else handle multi-mapping reads and TopHat?

    Also, in the SAM output file, I noticed that the mate pair reference is always set to '=' even if the two mates map to different references.

    Finally, would it be possible to add the 'insert size' parameter to the accepted_hits.sam file?

    Best regards, and thanks again!
  • MerFer
    Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 21

    #2
    Originally posted by choy View Post
    Hi all -
    Also, in the SAM output file, I noticed that the mate pair reference is always set to '=' even if the two mates map to different references.

    Finally, would it be possible to add the 'insert size' parameter to the accepted_hits.sam file?

    Best regards, and thanks again!
    In tophat manual there is already an option for the expected inner distance between mate pairs. I think, it would help you.

    -r/--mate-inner-dist <int> This is the expected (mean) inner distance between mate pairs. For, example, for paired end runs with fragments selected at 300bp, where each end is 50bp, you should set -r to be 200. There is no default, and this parameter is required for paired end runs.

    Best
    Meryem

    Comment

    • choy
      Member
      • Jul 2009
      • 14

      #3
      Originally posted by MerFer View Post
      In tophat manual there is already an option for the expected inner distance between mate pairs. I think, it would help you.

      -r/--mate-inner-dist <int> This is the expected (mean) inner distance between mate pairs. For, example, for paired end runs with fragments selected at 300bp, where each end is 50bp, you should set -r to be 200. There is no default, and this parameter is required for paired end runs.

      Best
      Meryem
      Thanks Meryem. I am actually setting this parameter already. However, even though we pass the expected inner distance to TopHat, each individual mate pair will have its own insert size when mapped.

      I suppose that since TopHat maps to the human genome, it is not possible to approximate the actually insert size until transcript assembly is complete.

      Best regards,

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
        by SEQadmin2



        CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

        Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
        ...
        07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
        by SEQadmin2


        Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

        The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
        ...
        07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
      0 responses
      13 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
      0 responses
      31 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
      0 responses
      40 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
      0 responses
      26 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...