Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fgajardoe
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 7

    #1

    de novo assembly with MIRA and 454 single-end reads. Too much contigs

    Hi everybody!
    I'm new in NGS data processing and also in this great community.

    I have two sets of reads 454 single-end from Roche GS junior, the source organism is a yeast with an expected genome size of 12 Mb. i need to assembly this reads and finally obtain a draft of the genome. The problem is that i am getting too many contigs

    I extracted the reads from the sff files using the script sff_extract and i got 211981 reads of 40-630 bp with an average lenght of ~500 bp. i made the quality control by trimming ends using a threshold quality value of 35 and discarding all reads shorter than 100 bp. Finally i got 180585 reads of 100-469 bp (the sequence lenght distribution is pretty irregular).

    Then, i tried to do a denovo assembly with MIRA. like a first view, i ran

    mira --job=denovo,genome,accurate,454 --project=yeast 454_SETTINGS -LR:ft=fastq -LR:fqqo=33

    and i got:

    Avg. total coverage: 35.45

    Large contigs:
    ============
    Number of contigs: 17
    Total consensus: 58823
    Largest contig: 9561
    N50 contig size: 6322
    N90 contig size: 1575
    N95 contig size: 1281

    All contigs:
    ============
    Number of contigs: 10941
    Total consensus: 6832983
    Largest contig: 9561
    N50 contig size: 724
    N90 contig size: 357
    N95 contig size: 301

    Like there were too many contigs, i manipulate several parameters of MIRA to obtain better results. In general all looks like: if i sacrifice coverage, i got more "total consensus", but still a lot of contigs.

    here is one of the better assemblies i got:

    mira --job=denovo,genome,accurate,454 --project=yeast 454_SETTINGS -LR:ft=fastq -SKr=60 -AL:mrs=60 -AS:mrpc=10


    Avg. total coverage: 18.45

    Large contigs:
    =============
    Number of contigs: 655
    Total consensus: 665610
    Largest contig: 8794
    N50 contig size: 1043
    N90 contig size: 572
    N95 contig size: 539

    All contigs:
    ============
    Number of contigs: 5699
    Total consensus: 4835995
    Largest contig: 8794
    N50 contig size: 900
    N90 contig size: 532
    N95 contig size: 468

    i still think there is too many contigs. i thought that this two sets of reads (two sequencing supposedly) were enough to do a good draft, but now i doubt about this. i hope you could help me .

    Greetings and thanks in advance.
  • JackieBadger
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 385

    #2
    You're best bet is to join the Mira mailing list...it is very active and the author will most likely respond v.quickly

    Comment

    • fgajardoe
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2013
      • 7

      #3
      Originally posted by JackieBadger View Post
      You're best bet is to join the Mira mailing list...it is very active and the author will most likely respond v.quickly
      Hi JackieBadger, thanks for the advice, i am gonna do this also.

      Comment

      • mastal
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 666

        #4
        Have you tried using Newbler?

        In my experience it didn't produce as many small contigs as MIRA.

        Comment

        • JackieBadger
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2009
          • 385

          #5
          In addition...It looks like you are using v3.4...
          The latest development releases are a "totally different beast" and are so worth checking out...

          I also think that many people advise letting the assembler do most/all of the trimming if possible

          Comment

          • flxlex
            Moderator
            • Nov 2008
            • 412

            #6
            I am not sure whether your complaint about the number of contigs, or total consensus length, are the right way to look at the problem. The question should be, which assembly is the right one for my question? Long contigs may have misassemblies, for example.

            If you are using a yeast for which there is a close relative finished genome, you could compare your assembly to it and score completeness, errors etc. Or use reference-free assembly validation tools.

            Comment

            • fgajardoe
              Junior Member
              • Apr 2013
              • 7

              #7
              Hi everyone and thanks for your answers. I tried the solutions you said here and also i complemented these with some ideas of the MIRA mailing list.

              1) Do not trim the reads myself. i did it and effectively i got better results, but still a lot of contigs (4643 contigs; 11082975 bp of total consensus; N50 3348. this is for 'large contigs', 'all contigs' is very similar)

              2) Already said here, try Newbler. I got results just a little better than in the try i did with MIRA in 1). (3905 contigs; 11135342 bp of total consensus; N50 4044. this for large contigs)

              3) Try a reference assembly. I dont do this yet, but i think is my best bet.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                by SEQadmin2



                CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                ...
                07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                by SEQadmin2


                Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                ...
                07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                by SEQadmin2



                Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                ...
                07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
              0 responses
              15 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
              0 responses
              32 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
              0 responses
              23 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
              0 responses
              21 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...