Bioo Scientific has a kit with 48 barcodes that's available now.
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
Truseq genomic library
I have problems with the Truseq library kit. Some of my libraries work, some don't. I did size selection on e-gel and have very good gel recovery. However, some of the PCR didn't work. These libraries use different index adapters. Is it an index related ligation problem?
If you have experience with truseq genomic library kit, please share the experience with me.
Thanks
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
-
A bioinformatics question with chemistry inputs: I am trying to convert RNAseq cDNA Bioanalyzer read sizes to the correct TopHat read spacing (-r parameter). I used to subtract the sum of the lengths of the Illumina Paired-End adapters plus the sum of the number of bases read to get the read separation (negative if there's overlap). I'm trying to figure out how this should be adjusted now that we are using the TrueSeq kits with multiplexed adapters. I have their sequences, but I'm not sure exactly what's on each end of the molecule when it is Bioanalyzed. I know a TruSeq Adapter (all length 64) is ligated on the 5' end. No TruSeq Universal Adapter (length 59) "Y" at that point, right? My main question is what's on the 3' end -- the old PE second read adapter (33 bp), or something else?
Thanks!
Comment
-
-
The Truseq Y adapter is ligated on both sides, so after pcr, you have the top strand of the Y on one end and the bottom strand on the other.
Regarding your second question, I believe it should be larger, but I think the easiest thing to do is just to align a fraction of your lib with loose parameters and estimate the sd from there.
Comment
-
-
The lib ".hist" file produced by abyss-pe on genomic TruSeq v1 libs seems to have the size distribution 50-80 bp shorter than what I see on Agilient Bioanalyzer (HS DNA) chips of the PCR "enriched" libraries.Originally posted by Howie Goodell View PostA bioinformatics question with chemistry inputs: I am trying to convert RNAseq cDNA Bioanalyzer read sizes to the correct TopHat read spacing (-r parameter). I used to subtract the sum of the lengths of the Illumina Paired-End adapters plus the sum of the number of bases read to get the read separation (negative if there's overlap). I'm trying to figure out how this should be adjusted now that we are using the TrueSeq kits with multiplexed adapters.
Just to be clear: if these are generic RNA TruSeq libraries then double stranded cDNA is ligated to the Y-adapters. Meaning, the strand-context of the original mRNA is lost.Originally posted by Howie Goodell View PostI have their sequences, but I'm not sure exactly what's on each end of the molecule when it is Bioanalyzed. I know a TruSeq Adapter (all length 64) is ligated on the 5' end. No TruSeq Universal Adapter (length 59) "Y" at that point, right? My main question is what's on the 3' end -- the old PE second read adapter (33 bp), or something else?
Thanks!
If by 5' and 3' you refer to the amplicon strand that binds to the flow cell oligo, then the "3'" end has the index sequence priming site, the index, then the amplification priming site. The reverse complement of the index sequence priming site also serves as the second read priming site for PE sequencing.
--
Phillip
Comment
-
-
I should add, I it is possible that Illumina is putting some extra bases on the distal ends of their enrichment PCR oligos (PPC -- PCR Primer Cocktail in the TruSeq kits). But this is mainly based on the apparent size of the PPC oligos when run on an RNA (Pico) chip being around 80 nt.
Has anyone cloned and Sanger sequenced any TruSeq amplicons? The extra sequence, it it exists, should be visible there.
--
Phillip
Comment
-
-
This is a great document, I wanted to add to this thread:
Comment
-
-
Actually, we did some Sanger sequencing and found that the TruSeq Universal Adapter sequence has a deviation from the sequence indicated in the previous thread. We sequenced multiple fragment forward and reverse and the sequence always was AATGATACGGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCT indicating a G insertion. Maybe, this was restricted to the specific adapter charge we purchased.
Comment
-
-
I'm still waiting on the response from illumina, they sent me a document where they mix all the adapters, but I can't really tell apart which ones are illumina and which ones are Nextera V2. Does anybody know what are the adapter and primer sequences of the new nextera kit? Why is Illumina making it so hard to find this out, don't they know you can just sequence the kit with sanger seq and be done with it? Whats the big deal? They are just making their customers angry, if you really want to copy the nextera and sell generic "primers" I think you would just spend the time to sequence them no?
Comment
-
-
We have done directional libraries from bacterial mRNA using Truseq small RNA. If you have interested yet I can tell about them.Originally posted by Garyron View PostHi All,
Has anyone made directional libraries from bacterial mRNA using Truseq small RNA adapters? Any information on this will be helpful
Thanks
Comment
-
-
Illumina has the Stranded and Non-Stranded TruSeq RNAKits.
i don't know if the adapter Indices are the same for both kits, but I could not find which sequences the Stranded Kits use, until I found this document at Illumina.
Just in case anyone is looking for the same info.
Note that TruSeq Stranded RNA-seq Kits come in HT and LT (for throughput), and the latter includes 24 total unique indices, while the former has 96.
C
Comment
-
-
Keep in mind the HT adapters are dual indexed. So those require extra chemistry for HiSeq High Output runs. (Although they run without any special measures on the MiSeq and, I think, on the HiSeq using Rapid chemistry.)Originally posted by carmeyeii View PostIllumina has the Stranded and Non-Stranded TruSeq RNAKits.
i don't know if the adapter Indices are the same for both kits, but I could not find which sequences the Stranded Kits use, until I found this document at Illumina.
Just in case anyone is looking for the same info.
Note that TruSeq Stranded RNA-seq Kits come in HT and LT (for throughput), and the latter includes 24 total unique indices, while the former has 96.
C
Comment
-
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.
The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
...-
Channel: Articles
06-02-2026, 10:05 AM -
-
by SEQadmin2
With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.
Introduction
Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...-
Channel: Articles
05-22-2026, 06:42 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sequencing the Two-Toed Sloth Genome Reveals Jumping Genes Tied to Its Extreme Metabolism
by SEQadmin2
Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:58 AM
|
0 responses
7 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
Today, 11:58 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
|
0 responses
25 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
|
0 responses
34 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
|
0 responses
56 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
|
Comment