Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sciurus
    Member
    • Dec 2013
    • 23

    Need help interpreting these weird Bioanalyzer results

    Hi everybody,

    Today, I extracted RNA from plant material, which I want to - eventually - sequence. For quality check I ran them on the Bioanalyzer as I have done several times with the same type of samples and always had good results (high RIN, nice peaks, etc.) but this time it came out very weird... Lots of smear in some, in others almost nothing.
    I attached the whole output pdf, so maybe - please - someone here knows if this is my samples or the Chip or whatever?

    Thanks already! :-)
    Attached Files
  • flobpf
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 76

    #2
    Looks like RNA fragmentation or DNA contamination to me. The peaks are well correlated with the gel. If it was the chip, you'd have seen it across all samples. You might want to run an agarose gel yourself to confirm fragmentation. Maybe the DNAse treatment step was not very efficient? Or you didn't completely inactivate RNAse...
    Last edited by flobpf; 01-29-2014, 08:04 AM. Reason: grammar

    Comment

    • Sciurus
      Member
      • Dec 2013
      • 23

      #3
      I didn't do DNA-free treatment yet. But I hadn't done before either when the results were good.
      I was suggested that the RNA hadn't completely resolved in the buffer. Can that be?

      Comment

      • flobpf
        Member
        • Apr 2010
        • 76

        #4
        Originally posted by Sciurus View Post
        I didn't do DNA-free treatment yet. But I hadn't done before either when the results were good.
        I was suggested that the RNA hadn't completely resolved in the buffer. Can that be?
        If that was the case, I think you'd see lighter bands and lower RNA yields. You wouldn't see new bands.

        Comment

        • Sciurus
          Member
          • Dec 2013
          • 23

          #5
          Originally posted by flobpf View Post
          If that was the case, I think you'd see lighter bands and lower RNA yields. You wouldn't see new bands.
          Okay, thanks! So, you'd say it's DNA contamination?

          Comment

          • flobpf
            Member
            • Apr 2010
            • 76

            #6
            or RNA fragmentation due to incomplete inactivation of RNAse from sample.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
              by SEQadmin2


              Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

              The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
              ...
              07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
            0 responses
            18 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            24 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            37 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...