Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hyates
    Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 18

    How to perform grooming that galaxy does but on the commandline?

    How do I groom sanger reads into sanger reads on my local commandline using the same tool that galaxy has found here?

    In other words, I would like to do the following:
    • Obtain the same tool galaxy uses for grooming locally
    • Invoke this tool on my local commandline
    • Figure out how to use this tool on an entire directory of fastq files


    I of course went to galaxy and I only saw a reference to a paper, but I don't know where to obtain the tool?

    Thank you very much for reading this post.
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    There is no need to "groom" if your reads are already in sanger format.

    Comment

    • hyates
      Member
      • Jan 2014
      • 18

      #3
      Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
      There is no need to "groom" if your reads are already in sanger format.
      I am reading these notes and trying to duplicate the results. It states they used galaxy and the first step in the cleaning process was grooming. Specifically,
      Groomed 28403332 sanger reads into sanger reads
      They then trimmed and then filtered the results. So what I should really be doing is focusing on the trimming and filtering, yes?

      If so, my question is how can I obtain the tools galaxy uses for trim and filter for local commandline processing? Thank you for your patience and prompt answer.

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        You can get the code galaxy uses here (individual tools likely have other dependencies and it may not be simple to run them on the command line): https://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/repos/devteam

        As long as you know the reads are in sanger format (phred+33) you can go on to trimming/filtering.

        Comment

        • hyates
          Member
          • Jan 2014
          • 18

          #5
          Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
          You can get the code galaxy uses here (individual tools likely have other dependencies and it may not be simple to run them on the command line): https://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/repos/devteam

          As long as you know the reads are in sanger format (phred+33) you can go on to trimming/filtering.
          That's a great place to look. It would be nice if the tools had a readme.txt for dependencies, but I read whatever docs I can find first. If that doesn't work, I can always reach out again.

          That being said, thank you so much Geno. You've been a lot of help and I want you to know this. Have a great day.

          Comment

          • hyates
            Member
            • Jan 2014
            • 18

            #6
            Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
            As long as you know the reads are in sanger format (phred+33) you can go on to trimming/filtering.
            Okay, my background is not biology and I am in computer science. So maybe you can answer this to me because the person who did this isn't here anymore.
            1. It seems the data is 100 cycle SE from high output: 1 lane (Illumina HiSeq 2500)
            2. They did trimming from sanger to sanger data?
            3. How can I verify myself that this is phred+33 format?


            Did they make a mistake in grooming? It seems to me that Illumina HiSeq fastq data is not sanger? Or am I totally n00b?

            Comment

            • GenoMax
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2008
              • 7142

              #7
              Options for verifying phred+33 format: https://www.biostars.org/p/63225/

              If your dataset is already sanger format then in galaxy it is possible to assign ".fastqsanger" type to this data avoiding the grooming step.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by SEQadmin2


                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
              0 responses
              7 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
              0 responses
              12 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              20 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
              0 responses
              54 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...