Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • krelmer
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 3

    FLX vs Titanium library

    Hello,

    Last year we had a normalized cDNA library made by MWG and sequenced on 454 FLX with standard chemistry. One month later Titanium chemistry was released and we then learned that our very expensive normalized libraries could only be used with standard chemistry and never with Titanium. MWG should have told us this before hand!!! Anyway, I realise that the libraries fundamentally differ, but I am wondering if anyone knows of a homemade method to upgrade our libraries? Even if we lose some read length it would still be better than reverting to an earlier chemistry (we get 530 Mb with cDNA in Titanium and only got 115 Mb with standard chemistry).

    Thanks!

    Kathryn
  • flxlex
    Moderator
    • Nov 2008
    • 412

    #2
    In theory, the only way I could think of converting the library would be by putting Titanium adaptors on the molecules. However, the library is single stranded, meaning it would have to be converted to dsDNA first. Also, the amount of library material is relatively minute. Perhaps amplification could help here, but that is going to introduce some bias.

    So in practice, I am afraid you are out of luck...

    Comment

    • krelmer
      Junior Member
      • Nov 2009
      • 3

      #3
      Ok, thanks for the tip!

      Comment

      • nextgen
        Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 26

        #4
        Can you design a new PCR primer to include part of old adaptor sequence and the new adaptor sequence? When you re-amplify your library for a few cycles, the new adaptor sequence will be added.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        53 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...