Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pingu
    Member
    • Jul 2015
    • 26

    Demultiplexing

    Hello,
    I have to demultiplex my fastq file, I have seen that about 200 reads are not assigned (total is 17000), there is a tool that can check barcode on 5' and 3'?
    Thank you very much
    Last edited by pingu; 09-19-2015, 02:00 AM.
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Are you referring to an internal barcode that is present in the read itself? Do you know what those barcodes are?

    Comment

    • pingu
      Member
      • Jul 2015
      • 26

      #3
      Thank you for your help, I know the barcodes and they are at the of the reads (last 10bp)
      For example, this read is not assigned:
      @JBMBIZC01CKLPI
      CACTGTAGAAGACTCGGCAGCATCTCCATGAGCCAGTATTGAAAATGTTGAAGATCAAAAAA
      CACTAAGTTTTTCCAAAGTTAATATCCAATGTAAAAGATAGCAAATGCATACCCACAAACTGTA
      AATGAAGATATTTGCGTTGAGGAACTTGTGACTAGCTCTTCACCCTGCAAAAATAAAAATGCA
      GCCATTAAATTGTCCATATCTAATAGTAATAATTTTGAGGTAGGGCCACCTGCATTTAGGATAG
      CCAGTGGTAAAATCGTTTGTGTTTCACATGAAACATTAAAAAAGTGAAAGACATATTTACAGA
      CAGTTTCAGTAAAGTAATTAAGGAAAACAACGAGAATAAATCAAAAATTTGCCAAACGAAAA
      TTATGGCAGGTTGTTTGGAGAACAGTGACGATCGCCTACAGTGCT

      The barcodes of the reads is: AGCACTGTAG and it is a complementary reverse: CTACAGTGCT,
      I have MID at the start of the reads (5') e at the end (3'), the barcode splitter tool checks MID at 5' and I have allowed 2 mismatches.
      Last edited by pingu; 09-19-2015, 01:28 PM.

      Comment

      • sklages
        Senior Member
        • May 2008
        • 628

        #4
        Looks like 454 data. If you have the original SFF file you could use Roche's sfffile tool to demultiplex your data. It recognizes 5' and 3' barcodes/MIDs.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          Yesterday, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        6 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        18 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        52 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...