Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ClemBuntu
    Member
    • Dec 2014
    • 37

    Issues with cuffdiff

    Hello,

    I'm performing an analysis containing 3 samples per conditions and 5 conditions (so 15 samples in total). I want to do pairwise comparison for each condition.

    I'm just starting using cuffdiff.
    Firsly I just tested cuffdiff with only 2 conditions, like that :

    Code:
    cuffdiff -L control,A -p 16 --library-type fr-firststrand --no-update-check  reference.gtf control_1.bam,control_2.bam,control_3.bam A_1.bam,A_2.bam,A_3.bam

    And I obtained 3 differentially expressed genes in the gene_exp.diff file.

    Then I tried to do all my comparisons in one command line :

    Code:
    cuffdiff --output-dir allComparisons  -L control,A,B,C,D -p 16 --library-type fr-firststrand --no-update-check  reference.gtf control_1.bam,control_2.bam,control_3.bam A_1.bam,A_2.bam,A_3.bam B_1.bam,B_2.bam,B_3.bam C_1.bam,C_2.bam,C_3.bam D_1.bam,D_2.bam,D_3.bam

    And looking at the gene_exp.diff file in output, I obtained 2 differentially expressed genes between control and A which only one in common with the 3 genes I obtained before.

    Which analysis I should trust ?
    And what is the good way to use cuffdiff ?
    Last edited by ClemBuntu; 11-18-2015, 01:05 AM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
11 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
14 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
54 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...