Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gongyh211
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2016
    • 3

    What's happening about my kmer spectrum? Heterozygous or repeats?

    I am doing a denovo genome sequencing and i get the kmer spectrum using clean reads of two paired end libarary data(see attach files). From the plot, i see high sequencing bias and two peaks, but i can not know whether the first peak(highest) is homozygous peak or heterozygous peak, the two situation are quite different. Whether the second peak (2X peak) is from large fragment duplication? or the first peak is heterozygous peak?
    Attached Files
  • westerman
    Rick Westerman
    • Jun 2008
    • 1104

    #2
    It is difficult to differentiate between zygosity effects and duplications. In part it depends on the type of organism you are sequencing. Plants are notorious for duplications but then it can be easy to breed them to be homozygous. So a bit more information would be appreciated.

    Comment

    • gongyh211
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2016
      • 3

      #3
      Originally posted by westerman View Post
      It is difficult to differentiate between zygosity effects and duplications. In part it depends on the type of organism you are sequencing. Plants are notorious for duplications but then it can be easy to breed them to be homozygous. So a bit more information would be appreciated.
      Thank you Westerman. What i am sequencing is a green algae probably diploid but we didnot have direct evidence.
      From the kmer spectrum, if the first mean peak is heterozygous peak, then it is so serious. I extracted the longest scaffold and two chloroplast scaffolds from the draft assembly, it shows 1.6%,2.1%,3.1% SNP (i use a simple ciritera: base coverage>=5 and highest nuc > 80%). It is very puzzled (chloroplast SNP>nuclear genome SNP?). One paper sequenced the chloroplast genome but very fragment(the author's explanation is repeats).
      Do you know why Dunaliella salina still not public one usable version from JGI? Our algae is near to Dunaliella salina from phylogenetic tree.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      9 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      13 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...