Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • caiosuz
    Member
    • Dec 2015
    • 12

    Velvet usage

    Hi everyone!

    I'm trying to use velvet to work with unmapped_reads of a rna-seq experiment, to make a kind of quantification of the contaminants of my sample.

    I was reading this quick guide about velvet usage http://www.embnet.org/sites/default/...d_Oases-QG.pdf and some doubts occurred me:

    1st doubt - It's written that -exp_cov must be used only with genomic data, so, I can't use it my data, ok?
    2nd doubt - If I mustn't use the -exp_cov, can I use the -cov_cutoff?
    3rd doubt - How are the coverage values calculated? Is it a kind of percentage related to the size of each read?

    Thank you all!
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    Velvet is probably not the best assembler to use for assembling assorted junk in RNA-seq, which will probably have very high coverage variability. You might try Spades or Tadpole, both of which are much more tolerant of strange input, and don't need fixed coverage settings.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
      by SEQadmin2



      Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

      There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
      Today, 05:17 AM
    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:08 AM
    0 responses
    6 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
    0 responses
    8 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    31 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    28 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...