Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • incognitos
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2015
    • 9

    longest nextseq read length

    Hi all,

    I was wondering if anyone has any idea/experience regarding what the max read length in 1 direction for a nextseq run might be? For example, the 300 cycle kit recommends 2x150, but has anyone tried greater than 150 in 1 direction?
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    One can setup asymmetric runs (know for sure with MiSeq, assume it is the same with NextSeq). So it should be possible to run 300 cycles in one direction if that is what you want. Probably would not be ideal in terms of Q-scores towards the end of the cycles.

    Comment

    • Brian Bushnell
      Super Moderator
      • Jan 2014
      • 2709

      #3
      I'm not sure whether it's possible to do >150bp runs on the NextSeq, but I am sure that I wouldn't want to go much longer.



      This is a recent run on our NextSeq. Read 1 hits a 1.4% error rate on cycle 150, which is tolerable. But at that point the error rate is increasing by 50% every 30 bases, so it would be projected to hit 2.1% at 180bp, 3.15% at 210 bp, and >10% at 300bp.
      Attached Files

      Comment

      • Yepler
        Member
        • Oct 2010
        • 22

        #4
        Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
        One can setup asymmetric runs (know for sure with MiSeq, assume it is the same with NextSeq). So it should be possible to run 300 cycles in one direction if that is what you want. Probably would not be ideal in terms of Q-scores towards the end of the cycles.
        Yep, you can do asymmetrical runs on the NextSeq. I don't know about the length question (sorry - my run was 50/26). I *have* seen that as the sequencing proceeds, the quality goes down, so I'd be really interested to see what you get if you go for 300 cycles! Good luck.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        53 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...