Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lobbytruckers
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2017
    • 1

    Minimum sequencing (and coverage) requirement for human ATAC-seq libraries?

    Hi all,

    I just got some multiplexed ATAC-seq libraries done, where I got anywhere between 50-90 million reads per sample. Greenleaf's current protocol article (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...b2129s109/full) suggests that anywhere > 50 mil mapped reads is good to infer open chromatin in human samples, whereas you need > 200 mil reads to footprint transcription factors. We usually do paired end HiSeq 3000 runs.

    Can anyone who has done ATAC-seq on human genome provide some insight? What raw read numbers were you shooting for? What kind of coverage is acceptable for publication? How many HiSeq or NextSeq lanes/cells did you end up using?

    I'm trying to figure out how much more sequencing we need to do in order to get results that are publishable based on the norms (mostly for coverage) but I'm not too familiar with a lot of ATAC-seq publications yet (besides the primary Greenleaf publications), so if anyone else has an input on this, I would really appreciate it! With the above mentioned metrics, I'm currently at ~3x average coverage for the entire human genome.
    Thanks so much!
  • vadoue
    Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 20

    #2
    Hi you!

    I was wondering if you got your answer. Also I saw that you used HiSeq3000. Did you used 2x75 or 2x150bp reads? I am planning to use 2x150 and I was wondering if I could "lost" small fragments information...

    Thank you!

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    7 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    53 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...