Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nsharma
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2018
    • 2

    V4-V5 Region Using 2x250 - Enough Overlap?

    Hi All,

    We've been looking at the V4 region (515/806) in environmental samples for some time successfully. We'd like to move to the V4-V5 region using the 515/926 primers. That would result in a larger amplicon (~411 not including primer/barcode sequences).

    Our sequencing provider runs 2x250 regularly but 2x300 only sporadically so the cost would be significantly more unless we have lots of samples. Does anybody have experience using 2x250 with this region? Will there be enough overlap of the paired reads to assemble?

    Thanks for any insight!
  • pmiguel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2328

    #2
    I think the critical factor is that at a cluster density where you produce the most sequence (even the most Q30 bases), the quality of single-plex amplicon runs deteriorates badly over the last 50 bases of a 250 cycle read. Whereas if you keep the density much lower--such that you may only generate 10 million or fewer clusters--the quality can be high all the way to the ends of the reads.

    At these lower cluster densities we see pair merging occurring successfully at rate approaching 90% even with 450bp inserts.

    600 cycle cassette? I don't know, is anyone getting reasonable 300 base reads with those?

    --
    Phillip

    Comment

    • nsharma
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2018
      • 2

      #3
      Sorry for the late reply. Thanks! This helps a lot. We're discussing with our service provider and will be doing some test runs to evaluate the data.

      Comment

      • thermophile
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2015
        • 243

        #4
        I wouldn't move to the longer region on the 2x250 kit. Allegedly the 2x300 is better in the past ~year but I haven't tested it out so continue offering amplicons that are <300bp long.
        Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        6 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        53 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...