Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • criscruz
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2015
    • 7

    why i have less than 50% reads surviving in pair after trimming adapters?

    Hi All.

    I'm using a ramdom amplification protocol and for library preparation I'm using Nextera XT. I'm performing seq step with Miseq reagent kit v3 600 cycles but i only use 200 cycles instead of 300 in order to get better quality score.

    After adapters trimmed with Trimmomatic I've got this result:

    TrimmomaticPE: Started with arguments:
    -phred33 -trimlog 12143_trimlog.txt 12143_R1.fastq.gz 12143_R2.fastq.gz 12143_FWP.fq.gz 12143_FWUP.fq.gz 12143_REVP.fq.gz 12143_REVUP.fq.gz ILLUMINACLIP:/home/dell/miniconda3/share/trimmomatic/adapters/NexteraPE-PE.fa:2:30:10
    Multiple cores found: Using 4 threads
    Using PrefixPair: 'AGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG' and 'AGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG'
    Using Long Clipping Sequence: 'GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG'
    Using Long Clipping Sequence: 'TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG'
    Using Long Clipping Sequence: 'CTGTCTCTTATACACATCTCCGAGCCCACGAGAC'
    Using Long Clipping Sequence: 'CTGTCTCTTATACACATCTGACGCTGCCGACGA'
    ILLUMINACLIP: Using 1 prefix pairs, 4 forward/reverse sequences, 0 forward only sequences, 0 reverse only sequences
    Input Read Pairs: 2764988 Both Surviving: 658763 (23.83%) Forward Only Surviving: 2105922 (76.16%) Reverse Only Surviving: 288 (0.01%) Dropped: 15 (0.00%)
    TrimmomaticPE: Completed successfully

    FastQC basic statistics for forward before triimmig
    Encoding Sanger / Illumina 1.9
    Total Sequences 2764988
    Sequences flagged as poor quality 0
    Sequence length 201
    %GC 42

    FastQC basic statistics for forward paired after triimmig
    Encoding Sanger / Illumina 1.9
    Total Sequences 658763
    Sequences flagged as poor quality 0
    Sequence length 1-201
    %GC 41
    Why I have a very low % of both surviving and why a high value for forward only?

    I really appreciate your feedbacks.


    thanks

    Chris
    Last edited by criscruz; 08-05-2018, 09:31 PM.
  • kmcarr
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 1181

    #2
    Originally posted by criscruz View Post
    <CLIP>
    Why I have a very low % of both surviving and why a high value for forward only?

    I really appreciate your feedbacks.


    thanks

    Chris
    This result indicates that your library included a large percentage of fragments with insert size less than or equal to 200bp in length. The way Trimmomatic paired end trimming operates (by default) when it finds the forward and reverse read overlap 100% (i.e. the insert is shorter than the read length) it keeps read 1 and discards read 2. The result is read 1 (forward) surviving but read 2 (reverse) not. When the overlap is only partial or not at all (i.e. insert is > 200bp) both read 1 and read 2 survive.

    Comment

    • criscruz
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2015
      • 7

      #3
      thanks so much kmcarr

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
      0 responses
      38 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
      0 responses
      61 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...