Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lletourn
    Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 63

    GATK DepthOfCoverage at high depth

    I have a sample on which custom capture was done. Many of the baits have >2000x coverage.

    When running DepthOfCoverage initially I never saw values >500x but then noticed I forgot to set the bins bigger. I set them at 20,000 just to be safe, now no values go over 1000...I really don't get why.
    I even set a summaryCoverageThreshold at 1200 and it's always 0.

    With genome browser I can clearly see some baits at >2000 even some at 5000.

    Any ideas

    Here's the command:
    Code:
    java -jar /data/solexa/aligners/GenomeAnalysisTK-1.0.5777/GenomeAnalysisTK.jar -T DepthOfCoverage -R human_hg19.fasta -I sample.bam -o sample.targetCoverage -L all.interval_list --minMappingQuality 15 --minBaseQuality 10 --omitDepthOutputAtEachBase --logging_level ERROR --summaryCoverageThreshold 30 --summaryCoverageThreshold 50 --summaryCoverageThreshold 200 --summaryCoverageThreshold 500 --summaryCoverageThreshold 700 --summaryCoverageThreshold 1000 --summaryCoverageThreshold 1200 --summaryCoverageThreshold 2000 --start 1 --stop 20000 --nBins 19999
  • lletourn
    Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 63

    #2
    I finally found my answer.

    By default GATK downsamples by sample. The downsampling coverage is...drum roll...1000.

    To fix this set the number of bins *AND* set -dt NONE

    Why one would downsample when computing coverage is beyond me.

    Comment

    • spreeth84
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 9

      #3
      Thanks! looks like this also happens in the Unified Genotyper in reporting the AD and DP numbers. I was struggling to explain why the DP did not match the coverage at the position and if the quality filters were being too stringent!

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
        by SEQadmin2


        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
        ...
        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      46 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
      0 responses
      105 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
      0 responses
      125 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...