Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kulikov
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 3

    Originally posted by boetsie View Post
    Hi Kulikov,

    Are the contigs of summary1.txt a mix of the two assemblies? In other words; are parts of the contigs present in other contigs? Because what i think has happened, is that reads could map to multiple contigs. SSPACE does not allow reads to map to multiple contigs.

    Boetsie
    Hi Boetsie,

    No, contigs1 is not a mix. This is just a raw set of contigs. contigs2 are obtained from contigs1 after repeat resolving stage. I guess some parts of contigs may be present in other contigs (in contigs1), but it is still strange that no pair is found on contigs.

    Btw, what happens if not only a read, but also its reverse complementary is mapped somewhere?

    Comment

    • boetsie
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 245

      Originally posted by kulikov View Post
      Hi Boetsie,

      No, contigs1 is not a mix. This is just a raw set of contigs. contigs2 are obtained from contigs1 after repeat resolving stage. I guess some parts of contigs may be present in other contigs (in contigs1), but it is still strange that no pair is found on contigs.

      Btw, what happens if not only a read, but also its reverse complementary is mapped somewhere?
      Could you check two things;
      - are there are any readfiles generated for this project in folder 'reads'?
      - If there are, can you try to run it on a subset of your contigs (2 contigs for example) and see how if any reads align.

      If a read can map to more than one location (reverse complement and normal) it is not used for scaffolding.

      Regards,
      Boetsie

      Comment

      • Ashu
        Member
        • Aug 2010
        • 15

        Hi Boetsie,
        I was trying to use test the with extension x -1 , and it takes a lot of time and memory, I dont have a memory problem, but time. What is your experience with a mouse genome, around 75x coverage
        Thank you in advance,
        cheers,
        Ashu

        Comment

        • boetsie
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2010
          • 245

          Hi Ashu,

          I know it takes a lot of time to extend the contigs, especially with large genomes. Can you tell me what part takes up the most time?

          I've speeded up some things of contig extension in the SSPACE premium, you can give it a shot. One thing is the mapping of the reads against the contigs, which is now multithreaded. Another is the search for partial overlap of the reads on the contigs, which uses a faster method.

          I've never ran SSPACE extension on a eukaryotic genome myself, sorry i can't tell you.

          Regards,
          Boetsie

          Comment

          • Ashu
            Member
            • Aug 2010
            • 15

            Hi Boetsie,
            Thank you for your suggestions, I will try it. Can you may be show the parameters you used for the panda.
            Thank you,
            Cheers,
            Ashu

            Comment

            • boetsie
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2010
              • 245

              Originally posted by Ashu View Post
              Hi Boetsie,
              Thank you for your suggestions, I will try it. Can you may be show the parameters you used for the panda.
              Thank you,
              Cheers,
              Ashu
              For the Panda genome I did not do any extension. For scaffolding I used

              -x = 0
              -k = 3
              -a = 0.7
              -n = 15

              Regards,
              Boetsie

              Comment

              • kulikov
                Junior Member
                • Sep 2011
                • 3

                Originally posted by boetsie View Post
                Could you check two things;
                - are there are any readfiles generated for this project in folder 'reads'?
                - If there are, can you try to run it on a subset of your contigs (2 contigs for example) and see how if any reads align.

                If a read can map to more than one location (reverse complement and normal) it is not used for scaffolding.

                Regards,
                Boetsie
                Hi Boetsie,

                Yes, this was caused by the fact that each contig was present together with its reverse complementary. After leaving only one contig from each pair everything works great.

                Thank you for your help and for designing SSPACE! =)

                Best,
                Sasha

                Comment

                • boetsie
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 245

                  Originally posted by kulikov View Post
                  Hi Boetsie,

                  Yes, this was caused by the fact that each contig was present together with its reverse complementary. After leaving only one contig from each pair everything works great.

                  Thank you for your help and for designing SSPACE! =)

                  Best,
                  Sasha
                  Ah, great! Good that the problem is solved. I already thought something like that was happening.

                  Thanks for the support and the nice comments!

                  Boetsie

                  Comment

                  • colindaven
                    Senior Member
                    • Oct 2008
                    • 417

                    Hi Sspace users,

                    just a bug report and solution we experienced here on a Suse 64 bit system.

                    We had this error

                    "
                    =>Thu Sep 8 13:45:01 2011: Building Bowtie index for contigs (/working/colin/seq/cloneC/sspace/C40A_454AllContigs.fna)

                    Bowtie-build error; -1 at (directory)"

                    There was an issue with bowtie-build.

                    We solved by making sure the bowtie executables were all executable, ie. chmod a+x on the files in the SSPACE/bowtie subdirectory. We also did chmod g+w though that likely didn't do much.

                    cheers

                    Comment

                    • rskr
                      Senior Member
                      • Oct 2010
                      • 249

                      What is the run-time complexity for SSPACE? It seems that we are having trouble getting it to scale, and what was taking days on a smaller set is now taking several weeks on a larger set. Also is there anyway to get the alignments to be done in parallel?

                      Comment

                      • boetsie
                        Senior Member
                        • Feb 2010
                        • 245

                        Originally posted by rskr View Post
                        What is the run-time complexity for SSPACE? It seems that we are having trouble getting it to scale, and what was taking days on a smaller set is now taking several weeks on a larger set. Also is there anyway to get the alignments to be done in parallel?
                        Can you comment on what part of SSPACE you are having trouble, is it with contig extension or scaffolding?

                        In the SSPACE premium version i've made the read-in and Bowtie mapping multithreaded. Also the results are immmediately read-in into SSPACE, instead of writing the results to files and reading of those files. Extension has also speeded-up by immediately read-in of the results and faster way of finding overlap of the reads on the contigs.

                        Regards,
                        Boetsie

                        Comment

                        • rskr
                          Senior Member
                          • Oct 2010
                          • 249

                          Originally posted by boetsie View Post
                          Can you comment on what part of SSPACE you are having trouble, is it with contig extension or scaffolding?

                          In the SSPACE premium version i've made the read-in and Bowtie mapping multithreaded. Also the results are immmediately read-in into SSPACE, instead of writing the results to files and reading of those files. Extension has also speeded-up by immediately read-in of the results and faster way of finding overlap of the reads on the contigs.

                          Regards,
                          Boetsie
                          The basic version, but one that I have modified to read bwa files instead.

                          Comment

                          • Kennels
                            Senior Member
                            • Feb 2011
                            • 149

                            Hi boetsie

                            Is there a version for an Itanium machine (linux IA64)? Or anyway to compile it for such?

                            cheers,
                            kennels

                            Comment

                            • boetsie
                              Senior Member
                              • Feb 2010
                              • 245

                              Originally posted by Kennels View Post
                              Hi boetsie

                              Is there a version for an Itanium machine (linux IA64)? Or anyway to compile it for such?

                              cheers,
                              kennels
                              Hi Kennels,

                              I think the perl script will work everywhere, so it depends on Bowtie.
                              if there is a bowtie version that works for the Itanium machine, you can place the bowtie scripts in the bowtie folder of SSPACE.

                              Regards,
                              Boetsie

                              Comment

                              • Lisa0508
                                Junior Member
                                • Nov 2011
                                • 9

                                Hi Boetzer,
                                Thank you so much for your quick reply and patient explanation! It's working now. I just got registered on this forum yesterday. All settings were in a default condition. I'm very sorry I did not check the private message option. Now it's O.K. to recieve private messages. Thank you again!
                                Regards,
                                Lisa

                                Comment

                                Latest Articles

                                Collapse

                                ad_right_rmr

                                Collapse

                                News

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:58 AM
                                0 responses
                                10 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
                                0 responses
                                25 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
                                0 responses
                                35 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
                                0 responses
                                58 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Working...