Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lbthrice
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 4

    mpileup: specified region truncated.

    Hello gentlepeople,

    I am using the samtools 'mpileup' program.
    I wish to generate a pileup file for a specific region.
    I have several separate .bam input files that I am generating the pileups for.
    Unfortunately, mpileup truncates the region and I only get data for the first part of the region.
    I have ran the same command on different .bam files and get different results.

    When I command:

    samtools mpileup -f 'hg19.fa' -r chr6:27114408-27115845 'experiment01.bam' > out_PILEUP2.pile
    [mpileup] 1 samples in 1 input files
    <mpileup> Set max per-file depth to 8000

    I get a file with 746 lines.
    I am expecting 1438 lines because that is the size of the interval I have specified with the '-r' flag
    If I use mpileup with the same region but with a different .bam file I get a different size file.

    samtools mpileup -f 'hg19.fa' -r chr6:27114408-27115845 'experiment02.bam' > out_PILEUP3.pile
    [mpileup] 1 samples in 1 input files
    <mpileup> Set max per-file depth to 8000

    I get a file with 623 lines.
    Again, I am expecting 1438 lines because that is the size of the interval I have specified with the '-r' flag.

    The first line in both files is for chr6:27114408, as expected.
    BUT, the files are truncated at different positions.
    With experiment01.bam the final line of the pileup file is chr6:27115577.
    With experiment02.bam the final line of the pileup file is chr6:27115344.

    This must have something to do with the .bam file.
    Can someone tell me which parameter needs to be adjusted?
    I have consulted the manual but I could not identify anything that sounded applicable.

    Thanks for you time,
    Lionel (Lee) Brooks 3rd
    Dartmouth Genetics Grad Student
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    The simplest answer is that you just don't have any reads across part of your region.

    Try getting the .sam file for the same region +- 500 bases, or try looking at the whole .bam in IGV. You can zoom in on your region.

    Comment

    • gringer
      David Eccles (gringer)
      • May 2011
      • 845

      #3
      Yeah, mpileup doesn't generate lines for regions it has no reads on. If you need to work out whole-region coverage, then you should be looking at the column that gives the base number. For covered regions, this will increase by 1 per line (assuming no inserts), but will jump multiple bases when there are no reads.

      Comment

      • lbthrice
        Junior Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 4

        #4
        whoops, should have checked that...thanks!

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          Yesterday, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
          by SEQadmin2


          With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


          Introduction

          Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
          05-22-2026, 06:42 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        38 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        44 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
        0 responses
        49 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...