SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Polonator

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Polonator now for sale rubenken Polonator 1 10-14-2010 02:17 PM
Updated Polonator ready for launch! ECO Polonator 9 05-06-2010 01:51 AM
Anyone know details on Church's Polonator Next-Gen Sequencer? ECO Polonator 42 06-09-2009 04:01 AM
Hello from rbhuang of China! I am dreaming on Polonator G.007 rbhuang Introductions 0 03-31-2009 12:49 AM
Website for Polonator next-gen sequencer goes live! ECO Polonator 0 02-07-2008 02:52 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-14-2009, 12:17 PM   #1
rubenken
Junior Member
 
Location: Santa Barbara, CA

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7
Default Is the Polonator for real?

No one seems to mention the Polonator at sequencing conferences, as far as I can tell, nor does anyone know much about the company supposedly commercializing the system. Will the thing ever see the light of day in your opinion? I would think that most people want the sort of technical support that comes from a company with experience in the field.
rubenken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2011, 09:30 AM   #2
xmy0523
Junior Member
 
Location: Albuquerque

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1
Default

We have two Polonators G 007. in our lab. The Polonator is cheaper than others. It costs $150,000. It is a good open "machine".
xmy0523 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 11:03 AM   #3
csc
Member
 
Location: CA

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 22
Default

I know someone who has one. The impression I get is that it can't quite keep up with the throughput and read length of the major commercial platforms (just doesn't have the same R&D thrust behind it) but certainly has a lower barrier to entry cost-wise. It also looks like it would be a good platform to develop alternative applications due to the open-ness.
csc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2011, 04:25 AM   #4
pmiguel
Senior Member
 
Location: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,862
Default

I don't have a Polonator, but here is a reason to consider it serious:

Ever tried to do trouble-shooting on a commercial platform? It's pretty hard because much of what is going on is hidden from you, considered a "trade secret". That is, the companies are deliberately hiding from you the mechanisms of operation of a device you supposedly are doing science on.

Is that even science? Here is a test, try and write a manuscript where you refuse to divulge critical information about your methodology and see if you can get it published. It is unlikely you will succeed. Yet manuscripts are published every day containing data generated using methodologies not available to us. Why? Because those methodologies are performed using commercial instruments or kits.

Not all companies work this way. So, in principle, it is not necessary.

Polonator is one example. As csc says, they don't have the same amount of R&D plowed into them. But, hey, that is partially because we keep sinking our research dollars into products from companies that hide their methods from us.

--
Phillip
pmiguel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2011, 09:59 AM   #5
krobison
Senior Member
 
Location: Boston area

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 747
Default

I suspect MiSeq and IonTorrent will truly consign Polonator to a very small niche of true believers, as the cost advantages (both upfront & per sample) will evaporate. It sounds like a well engineered machine, but with very short reads and too little user base to drive the applications needed to make it interesting to a larger community.
krobison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2011, 01:24 AM   #6
steven
Senior Member
 
Location: Southern France

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 269
Default

Here is a link to the Max-Seq Genome Sequencer page from Azco Biotech.
steven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2011, 11:45 PM   #7
gavin.oliver
Senior Member
 
Location: uk

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 110
Default

Apparently the Polonator is no longer being sold but customers are being offered upgrade to the new Max-Seq.
gavin.oliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2011, 08:50 AM   #8
genseq
Member
 
Location: Russia

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 79
Default

The new version of Polonator - PinPoint Mini Sequencing Platform:
http://www.genomeweb.com/sequencing/...latf?page=show
genseq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 02:40 PM   #9
rskr
Senior Member
 
Location: Santa Fe, NM

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 250
Default

What exactly is the IP situation of the polonator?
rskr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2011, 12:25 PM   #10
cibertech
Member
 
Location: San Diego

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 25
Default Polonator update

"The new version of Polonator - PinPoint Mini Sequencing Platform"

Just to clarify: the closest thing you have to a "new version of the polonator" would be the MaxSeq, which is actually a very diferent instrument. It works with sequencing by syntesis (as well as with sequencing by ligation), and uses a library prep chemistry (rolonies) which is far easier to use than polonies, altough it can also use this last one. The PinPoint Mini is a smaller platform, with lower throughput, but faster runs, similar to another instrument that was recently released by another commercial company. This instrument is not available yet.
The strongest point of both the instruments is that running them will be much cheaper than all other current solutions. And for the MaxSeq, even the instrument itself is much cheaper than the other commercialy available platforms. If you have any questions about it, please let me know.
Ezequiel
cibertech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2012, 04:57 AM   #11
cibertech
Member
 
Location: San Diego

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 25
Smile Update on the system status

Hello everyone

Just to let you know:

As I already mentioned in this thread, the polonator is no longer being commercialized. Another instrument, which is partially derived from the polonator (some hardware parts only) is now available, called the MaxSeq.
This new instrument was totally redesigned by IBS, having SBS as a center piece of the instrument's development.
It will also carry other significant advantages, as higher throughput, faster runs and even cheaper consumables.

We are hoping to have a specific forum on the Sequencing Technologies/Companies section, so we can post some news about it.
In the mean time, I can tell you that we are now installing our first machine, and we have created a blog where everyone will be able to follow this installation as well as the following weeks of instrument's operation.
The blog is here:

http://maxseqinstallation.blogspot.com/

We will also bring some more news soon, regarding another instrument that will be officially launched in March.

Enjoy!
cibertech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 04:28 AM   #12
M13Berlin
Junior Member
 
Location: Berlin, Germany

Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2
Default Qiagen buys IBS

http://www.genomeweb.com/sequencing/...ncing-strategy

Now I can see it take off...
M13Berlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.